Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-10 Thread Arne Limburg
equivalent to ConversationScoped ;) ) - Mail original - De : Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features #1 imo those names don't fit at all. #2 starting

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-10 Thread Thomas Andraschko
to ConversationScoped ;) ) - Mail original - De : Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features #1 imo those names don't fit at all. #2 starting the scope

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-10 Thread Thomas Andraschko
: Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features #1 imo those names don't fit at all. #2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea (please have a look at [1] and even [2] as well as any other std. scope) and it's

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
you are very welcome to suggest a better name. regards, gerhard 2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com Suggestion: When porting CODI ConversationScope to DS, should it be possible to NOT name this Scope ConversationScope Currently, when using CODI, it is very confusing to have

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread titou10 titou10
DialogScope ? FlowScope ? (Possible confusion with JSF 2.2 ?) ExtendedConversationScope ? CustomConversationScope ? ConversationCustomScope ? ConversationExtendedScope ? ExtendedScope ? DSConversationScope ? RequestExtendedScope ? Also should this scope : - be started and terminated explicitely

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Adrian Gonzalez
all (or most of my needs) and is really easy to use. Adrian De : titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 14h56 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features DialogScope ? FlowScope ? (Possible

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread info
UltraScope ;-) Quoting hantsy han...@yahoo.com.cn: WizardScoped or FlowScoped On 6/6/2013 20:56, titou10 titou10 wrote: DialogScope ? FlowScope ? (Possible confusion with JSF 2.2 ?) ExtendedConversationScope ? CustomConversationScope ? ConversationCustomScope ? ConversationExtendedScope ?

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@ #1: users use it e.g. also for whole sub-sections and/or use-cases of an application - it doesn't fit imo @ #2: is reserved (see jsf 2.2+) regards, gerhard 2013/6/6 hantsy han...@yahoo.com.cn WizardScoped or FlowScoped On 6/6/2013 20:56, titou10 titou10 wrote: DialogScope ? FlowScope

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread titou10 titou10
+1 that WizardScope is a not a good name as this scope is used in other use cases than Wizard-like flows WindowConversationScope ? as it is a Conversation inside a Window scope which the CDI ConversationScope is less specific 2013/6/6 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @ #1: users use

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Adrian Gonzalez
: Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features #1 imo those names don't fit at all. #2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea (please have a look at [1] and even [2] as well as any other std. scope) and it's an important (+ intended) difference. regards

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Jason Porter
@deltaspike.apache.org Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features #1 imo those names don't fit at all. #2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea (please have a look at [1] and even [2] as well as any other std. scope) and it's

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
...@gmail.com À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org Cc : Envoyé le : Jeudi 6 juin 2013 15h21 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features #1 imo those names don't fit at all. #2 starting the scope explicitly is against the initial idea (please have a look at [1] and even [2] as well

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-03 Thread titou10 titou10
2013, 13:07 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features Mark, A little aggressive based on how long it took to get 0.4? Should this be a small release then? I'd like to add some level of BeanValidation support in this release, looks like the CODI and Seam features are pretty similar

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-03 Thread Adrian Gonzalez
De : titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com À : dev@deltaspike.apache.org Envoyé le : Lundi 3 juin 2013 14h43 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features For us  DS v0.5 should be focused on the JSF module and particularly on porting CODI scopes top get rid

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-03 Thread Karl Kildén
le : Lundi 3 juin 2013 14h43 Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features For us DS v0.5 should be focused on the JSF module and particularly on porting CODI scopes top get rid of CODI asap. ie: - port the CODI Conversation and related scopes to DS (Group etc.) - Enhance the WindowScope