I agree, sounds like something useful.

LieGrue,
strub



>________________________________
> From: Thomas Hug <thomas....@gmail.com>
>To: "dev@deltaspike.apache.org" <dev@deltaspike.apache.org> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2013, 16:02
>Subject: Re: Data module, full replacement for Seam Factories?
> 
>
>Hi Jason
>I can confirm there's nothing like that in the data module so far. +1 on
>the feature, handy stuff.
>
>
>On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
><rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Got it, thks.
>> Le 15 sept. 2013 07:32, "Jason Porter" <lightguard...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> > It's an ease of use thing. The big thing we're missing (I think) is the
>> > ability to easily setup @Named lists of entities. Seam 2 @Factory did
>> this
>> > remarkably well and easily. To do this now (again, I've only glanced
>> > through the code I think would be responsible for this in the data
>> module)
>> > you'd need to create a new class for each entity, create a producer and
>> > listen for the event. It would be great if we could do that all behind
>> the
>> > scenes for people and expose it simply with an annotation or class or
>> > something similar.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I dont get the need, using cdi event + repo looks enough. What do I
>> miss?
>> > > Le 14 sept. 2013 02:04, "Jason Porter" <lightguard...@gmail.com> a
>> > écrit :
>> > >
>> > > > I was looking at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18774025/how-can-i-update-a-collection-that-is-produces-applicationscoped
>> > > > and
>> > > > the data module came to my mind. I just did a quick glance through
>> the
>> > > code
>> > > > I thought was applicable, but I'm still doubtful it'll actually do
>> > what I
>> > > > want. Can someone correct me if the data module will actually do
>> this?
>> > > >
>> > > > If not, it sure sounds like a killer feature to implement. We'd need
>> to
>> > > > create events, probably add some more metadata to it, and possibly
>> > create
>> > > > some beans so there's a concrete class, or perhaps some
>> > > InvocationHandlers.
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jason Porter
>> > > > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jason Porter
>> > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to