Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, e.g.: the new window-api doesn't fit to the api/spi of codi (see WindowContext - same name, but different artifact) regards, gerhard 2013/11/14 Thomas Andraschko > Mark, i know - we are all full of work. > I could of course help to refactor the ViewAccessScoped stuff but i have no

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-14 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Mark, i know - we are all full of work. I could of course help to refactor the ViewAccessScoped stuff but i have no idea how the new API should look like or whats exactly not that good in the current implementation. I have not that expierence from the CODI development like you and Gerhard. Its not

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
if there wouldn't be a blocker (for ds), i would have done/suggested it already. -> -1 for a 1:1 import regards, gerhard 2013/11/14 Mark Struberg > Thomas, you are really welcome to help us with pushing those features. > Others as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > - Original Message --

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-14 Thread Charles Moulliard
As documentation and quality of examples is critical to promote DeltaSpike project, I will take care of that during next weeks as I will be more available on the project. But first I would like to finalize some issues with Apache Camel CDI Extension running on Karaf (Weld, Webbeans). As Weld 2.1.

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-14 Thread Mark Struberg
Thomas, you are really welcome to help us with pushing those features. Others as well. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Thomas Andraschko > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2013, 23:51 > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or