I like @DeltaSpike but as gerhard said, maybe it's better to use one
without the project name in it? On the other side, DeltaSpike is the final
name...
Maybe @ExtensionManaged?
2014-02-18 8:54 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
@Gerhard: loos too much to existing JMX APIs +
Project name should be fine now, if not all pakcages will change so
same impact than annotation name
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-18 9:18 GMT+01:00
@romain: the point is that it isn't expressive at all...
regards,
gerhard
2014-02-18 9:20 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Project name should be fine now, if not all pakcages will change so
same impact than annotation name
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Thats right gerhard but from this perspective, isn't @DeltaSpikeManaged the
best?
2014-02-18 9:26 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
@romain: the point is that it isn't expressive at all...
regards,
gerhard
2014-02-18 9:20 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
@romain:
maybe not @Managed (it was just @DeltaSpikeManaged without the
project-name), but @ManagedResource is at least more expressive than the
project-name itself.
(that it's managed by ds is clear due to the package-name imo)
regards,
gerhard
2014-02-18 9:30 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
well managedresource looks really like a jmx stuff for me and since it
uses cdi managed is quite obvious. That's why i thought the project
name would fit and make the origin obvious.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn:
@romain:
you will always have same/similar terms in different areas (see e.g.
message).
regards,
gerhard
2014-02-18 10:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
well managedresource looks really like a jmx stuff for me and since it
uses cdi managed is quite obvious. That's why
I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about the @ManagedBean
disaster in JavaEE itself. 'Managed' is in the same ballpark like 'Class' or
'Object'.
Managed by whom and what?
In that case I'd rather go with @DeltaSpike or keep @Web...
But I do not care that much about
we haven't seen a nice name so far - i would keep what we have right now
(it's redundant, but at least a bit more expressive).
regards,
gerhard
2014-02-18 10:20 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about the
@ManagedBean disaster
+1 kind of tradeoff
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
we haven't seen a nice name so far
Markus Schulz created DELTASPIKE-524:
Summary: illegal implementation of SecurityAwareViewHandler
Key: DELTASPIKE-524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-524
Project: DeltaSpike
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-524:
Attachment: DELTASPIKE-524.patch
illegal implementation of
hi @ all,
if we would move @Initialized and @Destroyed to ds-core, we could use them
for other parts as well (e.g. instead of @BeforeJsfRequest and
@AfterJsfRequest).
regards,
gerhard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-524:
Attachment: (was: DELTASPIKE-524.patch)
illegal implementation of
+1
I like such minor improvements and finalize such stuff :)
Whats the replacements for @After/BeforeJsfRequest then?
2014-02-18 13:23 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi @ all,
if we would move @Initialized and @Destroyed to ds-core, we could use them
for other
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 13:27, Thomas Andraschko
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
I like such minor improvements and finalize such stuff :)
Whats the replacements for @After/BeforeJsfRequest then?
2014-02-18 13:23 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek
@ thomas:
@Observes @BeforeJsfRequest FacesContext
@Observes @AfterJsfRequest FacesContext
-
@Observes @Initialized FacesContext
@Observes @Destroyed FacesContext
the implementation of @AfterJsfRequest fits to @Destroyed, but for
@Initialized we might have to move the logic (to get a real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-524:
Attachment: DELTASPIKE-524.patch
illegal implementation of
sounds good!
2014-02-18 14:19 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
@ thomas:
@Observes @BeforeJsfRequest FacesContext
@Observes @AfterJsfRequest FacesContext
-
@Observes @Initialized FacesContext
@Observes @Destroyed FacesContext
the implementation of @AfterJsfRequest
+1
2014-02-18 14:29 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com:
sounds good!
2014-02-18 14:19 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
@ thomas:
@Observes @BeforeJsfRequest FacesContext
@Observes @AfterJsfRequest FacesContext
-
@Observes @Initialized
20 matches
Mail list logo
