[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1319) labeled alternatives

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16382627#comment-16382627 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1319: - Commit

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

Strictly speaking, DS1.x is Java EE 6 based (because we are using CDI 1.0, JSF 2.0) But probably no harm in just setting compiler to java 8. (and indicate that DS 1.9 only run on Java EE 7 server with Java 8) On 1 March 2018 at 16:05, Thomas Andraschko wrote: > IMO

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

I think assuming all EE7 vendors support Java 8 then I think its fine. But I definitely believe we can't do EE6 on Java 8. John On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMO > DS1.x = JavaEE 7 > DS2.x = JavaEE 8 > > Java8 in 1.x is fine for me,

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

IMO DS1.x = JavaEE 7 DS2.x = JavaEE 8 Java8 in 1.x is fine for me, we can try to improve our APIs with Java8 In 2.x we can even improve further and cleanup then 2018-03-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > 2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > IMHO to move to Java 8 we need to drop support for EE6/EE7. So to me that > says the next version is 2.0 not 1.9.x. > It is way too early for cdi 2, almost no users rely on that yet compared to cdi 1.x. > > There are some

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

Maybe not drop EE7. I think all current app servers supporting Java EE 7 runs on Java 8. But removing EE6, means for example that we no longer need BeanProvider and other specific code for EE6. So changing to Java 8 has quite some impact (but Java 8 is wanted I guess) and thus requires 2.x

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

IMHO to move to Java 8 we need to drop support for EE6/EE7. So to me that says the next version is 2.0 not 1.9.x. There are some weld 1.1 versions that support this, but no testable AS7 instance that we can check against. John On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:35 AM Cody Lerum

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1320) global alternative spi to support custom (type-safe) mechanisms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16381663#comment-16381663 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1320: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1318) Unsatisfied dependencies for type ApplicationContext (deltaspike-cdictrl-weld) in payara 4.1.2.174

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16381650#comment-16381650 ] Andreas Keefer commented on DELTASPIKE-1318: org.jboss.weld.context.ApplicationContext is