+1
1.9.x seems very stable with minimal updates so it is unlikely to be
much of a burden to keep it alive for pre-Jakarta use.
I could see some people say setting a JDK 17 minimum would be
aggressive, but those starting new Jakarta projects or going through
the upgrade work for an older project
+1
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps for releasing DeltaSpike-1.8.1
>
> The following bugs and improvements got implemented:
>
> Bug
>
> • [DELTASPIKE-1252] - data-documentation missing Optional
At this point it seems the main driver for dropping Java6 is to
discourage its use. I think there is sufficient discouragement
elsewhere and anyone with active or new projects is working towards or
planning for Java7/8.
+1 for keeping Java6 until the next major bump.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:25
+1
On Apr 2, 2016 16:46, "Gerhard Petracek" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 24th release of Apache DeltaSpike
> out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>
> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> They will
+1
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 22th release of Apache DeltaSpike
> out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>
> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> They
+0
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote:
+0
2015-08-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
+1
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
Le 3 août 2015 22:44, John D. Ament
Builds + tests + looks fine locally for me.
+1
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 18th release of Apache DeltaSpike
out.
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
The tag is available at [3]
+1
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
@thomas:
see [1].
regards,
gerhard
[1]
https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/blob/master/deltaspike/readme/ReleaseNotes-1.2.1.txt
2014-12-21 21:29 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko
+1
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com wrote:
+1—
Sent from Mailbox
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 10th release of Apache DeltaSpike
out.
The artifacts are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cody Lerum closed DELTASPIKE-685.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Guard against null FacesContext in Exception Handler Bridge
+1 Blue
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi @ all,
this second vote is about the color and therefore the final logo.
i've uploaded the candidates provided by jim at [1]-[4].
please send a +1 for one of them.
regards,
gerhard
[1]
+1
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 8th release of Apache DeltaSpike
out.
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
The tag is available at [3] and will get pushed to the ASF repository
#1
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:26 PM, James Parenti ja...@visuale.net wrote:
Hello everyone:
This is a link to another set of revisions. The emblems shown are those that
have been commented favorably upon. As much as I like the “Geometric” font
logo, the more I look at it the less I like it
+1
builds and tests weld and owb fine on win 8.1 x64 7u51
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 7th release of Apache DeltaSpike
out.
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
The tag is
+1
builds fine on win 8x64 j7u51 with both weld and owb
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1
sig fine, rat passes, build runs without errors, all tests pass, hash sums
fine, LICENSE and NOTICE files in place and content is fine.
txs for running the
+1
To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
-C
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1
The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand
anto...@sabot-durand.net wrote:
+1
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix
the Tx stuff.
In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move to 1.0.
wdyt?
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 17
+1
US/Mountain
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
2014/1/16 Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
Hi all,
Max and Alexey from the JBoss Tools team (http://www.jboss.org/tools/)
would like to see we can improve the DeltaSpike
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-341
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Thomas Andraschko
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
what about providing DS' exception handling (@ExceptionHandler etc.) for
JSF?
AFAICS we would just need a small JSF ExceptionHandler.
Regards,
+1 for a 1.0 when docs are in order.
As far as versioning I prefer the same ver for each module. I do dislike
potentially having to release the exact same code multiple times just under
a different version but I don't know what the alternatives would be. If you
have modules with different version
+1
Builds and tests locally with Weld and OWB profiles (Win8.1 x64, Java 7u25)
No issues on an initial spin in my primary project moving form 0.4 to 0.5
(core,jpa,jsf,security)
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13673180#comment-13673180
]
Cody Lerum edited comment on DELTASPIKE-341 at 6/3/13 2:55 PM
22 matches
Mail list logo