[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13856870#comment-13856870
]
Christian Kaltepoth commented on DELTASPIKE-479:
------------------------------------------------
@ [~gpetracek]:
I totally agree with you that we need more tests that verify behavior in EAR
packaging scenarios.
But I think that your EAR test doesn't cover the most interesting case. You are
basically just adding the WAR from the standard test into an EAR file. I think
it would be more useful to test the "skinny WAR" packaging scenario which means
that all the libraries aren't in {{/WEB-INF/lib}} but in the EAR's {{lib}}
directory. There seem to be some class loading related problems in this case.
See DELTASPIKE-362, DELTASPIKE-386, etc. for examples.
Perhaps we could look for a way to simplify creating tests that run both
packaging scenarios? Perhaps we could automatically create an EAR with a skinny
WAR from a Shrinkwrap WebArchive? It would be great to have a very simply way
to create such tests without the need to create three classes and manually
repackaging.
Thoughts?
> add tests with simple ear-packaging
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: DELTASPIKE-479
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-479
> Project: DeltaSpike
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
> Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> for all tests with war-file deployments, we should also add a test which
> packages the war-file into an ear-file. that's the minimum we should
> safeguard with our tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
