Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-12 Thread Thomas Andraschko
me > > > vendors > > > > > > > require > > > > > > > >> it... > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> regards, > > > > > > > >> gerhard > > > > >

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-12 Thread Gerhard Petracek
gt;> > > > > > > >> 2016-04-07 13:18 GMT+02:00 Rooda, William (John.) < > > > wro...@ford.com > > > > >: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> Ford has an internal “shared farm” of servers

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-12 Thread Antoine Sabot-Durand
arm” of servers that our > > > applications > > > > > can > > > > > >>> use. The shared farm is Websphere Application Server 8.0.0.x. > > > This > > > > > only > > > > > >>> has Java6 available. While some

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-12 Thread Gerhard Petracek
; >>> procure their own servers outside of the shared farm, this is > > > > prohibitively > > > > >>> expensive without a powerful use case. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > &

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-09 Thread Gerhard Petracek
te - the WebSphere version I've seen > > the > > >>> Ford team mention a few times requires Java 7. In general, EE 7 > > systems > > >>> were built for Java 7 support (JMS made use of autocloseable is one > I > > can > > >>

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-09 Thread John D. Ament
almost all applications against Java6 until that time, and > >>> unfortunately we have to re-evaluate continuing to use at an > enterprise > >>> level any open source software that no longer patches and supports > Java6 > >>> due to the risk it introduc

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Cody Lerum
continuing to use at an enterprise >>> level any open source software that no longer patches and supports Java6 >>> due to the risk it introduces to our applications. We understand that this >>> makes us an outlier in the community of DeltaSpike users. >>> >>>

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Gerhard Petracek
> >> makes us an outlier in the community of DeltaSpike users. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> > >> > >> ~john > >> > >> > >> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] > &g

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Mark Struberg
community of DeltaSpike users. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> ~john >> >> >> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] >> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:13 AM >> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org; m

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Gerhard Petracek
int...@gtcgroup.com > Cc: Rooda, William (John.); Shvartsman, Oleg (O.I.); Hall, Todd (T.B.) > Subject: Re: Cutting over to Java 7 > > Hi Marvin, > > Thanks for the input. You can find our discussion/vote thread from last > month here: > http://mail-archives.apache.or

RE: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Rooda, William (John.)
...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:13 AM To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org; marvint...@gtcgroup.com Cc: Rooda, William (John.); Shvartsman, Oleg (O.I.); Hall, Todd (T.B.) Subject: Re: Cutting over to Java 7 Hi Marvin, Thanks for the input. You can find our discussion/vote thread from last month

RE: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Marvin Toll
to:johndam...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:14 PM > To: deltaspike <dev@deltaspike.apache.org> > Subject: Cutting over to Java 7 > > All, > > I wanted to get opinions for how to cut over to Java 7. > > There's two ways I've done similar cut overs in

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread John D. Ament
he.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:14 PM > To: deltaspike <dev@deltaspike.apache.org> > Subject: Cutting over to Java 7 > > All, > > I wanted to get opinions for how to cut over to Java 7. > > There's two ways I've done similar cut overs in the past, wanted

RE: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-07 Thread Marvin Toll
. _Marvin -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:14 PM To: deltaspike <dev@deltaspike.apache.org> Subject: Cutting over to Java 7 All, I wanted to get opinions for how to cut over to Java 7. There's two ways I've done s