Re: some draft for DS-2.0

Without feature change I would still prefer the shade/relocation + bom option instead of 2 branches (recall you didnt maintain your geronimo-config branches? ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: some draft for DS-2.0

Mark, AFAICS you did it in a new main branch instead of master? I would move master to 1.9.x branch and do 2.x in master Why isnt it in GitHub? Thomas Andraschko schrieb am Do., 23. Sept. 2021, 21:33: > +1 for making it master > > Mark Struberg schrieb am Do., 23. Sept. 2021, > 20:13: > >> hi!

Re: some draft for DS-2.0

+1 for making it master Mark Struberg schrieb am Do., 23. Sept. 2021, 20:13: > hi! > > I've migrated a few things over to the jakarta namespace and started > dropping a few old features. > Right now it's just core which I got working, but will now also move over > module by module. > > The draft

some draft for DS-2.0

hi! I've migrated a few things over to the jakarta namespace and started dropping a few old features. Right now it's just core which I got working, but will now also move over module by module. The draft can be viewed here: https://github.com/struberg/deltaspike/tree/fb_ds20