Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-12-14 Thread Karl Kildén
I think 1.0 sounds great. Improving docs would be the best way to move
deltaspike forward imo. My major concern right now is the windowId stuff. I
like many want the functionality but struggles with dual ids (windowId 
dsRid) a loading splash. Would love docs here that covers the different
strategies and routes one can take.

cheers



On 15 November 2013 14:31, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.dewrote:

 +1 for releasing 1.0 next
 -1 for subreleases. This would be very confusing.
 +1 for improving the documentation before the 1.0 release. This is IMHO
 more important than examples.


 2013/11/11 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

  Well if code is released it should be stable or explicitely in
  alpha/beta..maybe we should do subreleases for unstables modules
  Le 11 nov. 2013 18:43, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
 
   Oki folks, txs 4 the feedback, all!
  
  
   I'd say we should create the module-maturity-matrix.md first and then
 we
   might do the version bump.
   Maybe something like green/blue/orange/red for mature / ready but still
   needs a few features / ready but might change it's api still / work in
   progress
  
  
   LieGrue,
   strub
  
  
  
  
   - Original Message -
From: Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.com
To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
Cc: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 18:25
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?
   
+1 to move to 1.0. We have done the same thing with Apache Aries
 moving
Blueprint from 0.5 to 1.0 release
   
   
   
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament
john.d.am...@gmail.comwrote:
   
 Yep, agreed.  Users care about the version #.  I would recommend
 that
   if we
 could release a 1.0 based on the current code base + some
 additional
   bug
 fixes we'll get huge wins.
   
 +1 to switching current to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
   
   
 On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
 
wrote:
   
  Hi!
 
  In the last 2 months I did a few conference talks and smaller
  presentations (OpenBlend, W-JAX, ..) and always got the same
questions:
  it's only a 0.x version, so is it already stable? I
don't like to use it
  in production with 0.x
 
  And the actual answer is: well, core, cdictrl, etc are stable
since a
  long time, other modules are not yet 100% where we like them.
 
  The other fact is that we will never get all our modules 100%
  stable.
  Because new modules cannot be released with the same quality than
  established and well known and bugfixed modules.
 
  Thus I think we should rather introduce a kind of majurity-matrix
  for
  DeltaSpike.
  A simple list of modules and their majurity grade.
 
 
 
  By officially moving to 1.0 we would gain much more users.
  I personally do not care about numbers, but LOTS of users do!
 
  Wdyt?
 
  LieGrue,
  strub
 
   
   
   
   
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog :  http://cmoulliard.github.io
   
  
 



 --
 Christian Kaltepoth
 Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
 GitHub: https://github.com/chkal



[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-454) Provide a ClientWindowRenderMode similiar to CODI

2013-12-14 Thread Oleg Varaksin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13848418#comment-13848418
 ] 

Oleg Varaksin commented on DELTASPIKE-454:
--

Every full page request causes displaying a Loading... page. This is quite 
strange. We don't want to see this page. I also noticed, full page requests are 
very slow in comparison to CODI (have a big web app). Please, don't show this 
Loading... page.

Even worst. DeltaSpike always shows Loading... when you download a binary 
content (e.g. PDF) too. That means, if the content-disposition for the content 
streaming is attachment (set in response header), the original page 
disappears! That's a bug. The original page should stay displayed.

So, I switched to CODI for now again.

 Provide a ClientWindowRenderMode similiar to CODI
 -

 Key: DELTASPIKE-454
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-454
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: JSF-Module
Reporter: Thomas Andraschko
Assignee: Mark Struberg

 Without LoadingScreen, JS, HTML and else.
 Its stable and works fine.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-467) Add default module.xml for jboss modules.

2013-12-14 Thread John D. Ament (JIRA)
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-467:


 Summary: Add default module.xml for jboss modules.
 Key: DELTASPIKE-467
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-467
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.5
Reporter: John D. Ament
Assignee: John D. Ament
 Fix For: 0.6


Add module.xml to the binary distribution, to make it easier to import to 
repackaged JBoss AS7+ distribution that includes DeltaSpike.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-467) Add default module.xml for jboss modules.

2013-12-14 Thread John D. Ament (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John D. Ament resolved DELTASPIKE-467.
--

Resolution: Fixed

Fixed

 Add default module.xml for jboss modules.
 -

 Key: DELTASPIKE-467
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-467
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.5
Reporter: John D. Ament
Assignee: John D. Ament
 Fix For: 0.6


 Add module.xml to the binary distribution, to make it easier to import to 
 repackaged JBoss AS7+ distribution that includes DeltaSpike.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-263) Generate binaries of DeltaSpike project

2013-12-14 Thread John D. Ament (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John D. Ament resolved DELTASPIKE-263.
--

Resolution: Fixed

Added a 'distribution' profile that when run will generate binaries in zip and 
tar.gz formats.

 Generate binaries of DeltaSpike project
 ---

 Key: DELTASPIKE-263
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-263
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 0.3-incubating
Reporter: Charles Moulliard
Assignee: John D. Ament
 Fix For: 0.6






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)


[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-193) Setup SecurityManager enabled CI build

2013-12-14 Thread John D. Ament (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John D. Ament updated DELTASPIKE-193:
-

Summary: Setup SecurityManager enabled CI build  (was: Setup 
SecurityManagager enabled CI build)

 Setup SecurityManager enabled CI build
 --

 Key: DELTASPIKE-193
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-193
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: 0.2-incubating
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Assignee: Mark Struberg
 Fix For: 0.6


 We currently don't have any CI environment which uses a SecurityManager. We 
 should add such an environment to check whether DeltaSpike properly uses 
 doPrivileged blocks where needed. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)