[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1070) Refactor RepositoryComponent/s

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16036121#comment-16036121 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1070: - Commit

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1264) Remove portions of BeanProvider/BeanManagerProvider

John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1264: - Summary: Remove portions of BeanProvider/BeanManagerProvider Key: DELTASPIKE-1264 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1264 Project:

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1263) Remove BeanBuilder

John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1263: - Summary: Remove BeanBuilder Key: DELTASPIKE-1263 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1263 Project: DeltaSpike Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1260) Remove Servlet Module

John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1260: - Summary: Remove Servlet Module Key: DELTASPIKE-1260 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1260 Project: DeltaSpike Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1261) Remove BeanVal Module

John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1261: - Summary: Remove BeanVal Module Key: DELTASPIKE-1261 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1261 Project: DeltaSpike Issue Type:

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

I agree with Thomas. While always minimal, if we can trim our internal libraries and make them a bit more user friendly, it will simplify how users leverage our modules (e.g. maybe we don't have a core module anymore). This means better module isolation. If Mark brings config to Geronimo via MP

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

IMO we should try to do a cut in 2.0 and do a big cleanup (1.x should be in maintenance to support < JavaEE8): - Drop bval module and the servlet module. AFAIR the injection support is already in JavaEE 8. - We can also try to remove some core APIs (BeanManagerProvider) - Cleanup the JSF Module

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1252) data-documentation missing Optional return value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16036004#comment-16036004 ] Jan Matèrne commented on DELTASPIKE-1252: - Thumbs up. You could close the issue. ;) >

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

imo there's not a lot we should drop, because users might need those parts e.g. for applications based on the micro-profile. maybe it's just a matter of documenting an useful combination of ee8 + ds and/or to highlight which parts of ds are covered by ee8. @ds2: maybe we should mainly take the

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

basically +1 we can do some cleanup (like removing features + modules which are available in JavaEE8) BUT - many user won't use JavaEE8 until next year as the AS' are not ready. So IMO it's not necessary now. I will currently start to do some internal cleanup on the Data Module e.g. 2017-06-03

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

@romain: +1 regards, gerhard 2017-06-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi > > Any strong feature from cdi 2 we need? If so +1 otherwise -1 > > Le 3 juin 2017 16:07, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > > > Hey guys > > > > I'm not sure there's

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-1070) Refactor RepositoryComponent/s

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Andraschko updated DELTASPIKE-1070: -- Fix Version/s: 1.8.1 > Refactor RepositoryComponent/s >

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

Hi Any strong feature from cdi 2 we need? If so +1 otherwise -1 Le 3 juin 2017 16:07, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > Hey guys > > I'm not sure there's much more for us to do in 1.x as far as feature goes, > but I could be wrong. I do think we should start to ramp up work >

Re: [VOTE] [CANCEL] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0

I've updated the website (not published) as well, but need to add to news. Javadocs are there now as well. On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM Gerhard Petracek wrote: > short addition: > > it looks like all release steps after the (git) push are missing (see [1]). > > regards,

buildbot success in on deltaspike-site-staging

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder deltaspike-site-staging while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/deltaspike-site-staging/builds/167 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave Build Reason: The

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1252) data-documentation missing Optional return value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16035971#comment-16035971 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1252: - Commit

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-1259) upgraded version numbers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-1259. -- Resolution: Fixed > upgraded version numbers > >

Re: [VOTE] [CANCEL] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0

hi thomas, thx for the heads-up! we discussed it in the irc-channel already... i've pushed the fix, but we also have to upload the files for the download-page,... regards, gerhard 2017-06-03 12:57 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko : > Hi Mark, > > is everything ok with

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1259) upgraded version numbers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16035947#comment-16035947 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1259: - Commit

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1259) upgraded version numbers

Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-1259: Summary: upgraded version numbers Key: DELTASPIKE-1259 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1259 Project: DeltaSpike Issue

Re: [VOTE] [CANCEL] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0

Hi Mark, is everything ok with the current builds? I did a fresh checkout today i cant build anymore: The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1] The project org.apache.deltaspike.modules:deltaspike-data-module-test-java8:1.8.0-SNAPSHOT