[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg resolved DELTASPIKE-507.
--
Resolution: Fixed
txs for the patch, Stefan!
Also txs to David Blevins for the hint
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-507:
Attachment: DELTASPIKE-507_with_cleanup_01.patch
> UserTransaction not availabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13877497#comment-13877497
]
Stefan Strobl edited comment on DELTASPIKE-507 at 1/21/14 2:31 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Strobl updated DELTASPIKE-507:
-
Attachment: DS_509_tested_on_was.patch
This is a first rough patch that utilizes Tran
>> And personally I think the PF partial submit simply contradicts the spec
Don't know about the specs exactly. partialSubmit is a feature which is not
available in the specs.
What does myfaces in this case? Just post all hidden inputs of the form?
But doens't matter, i added support for the dsPo
+1
And personally I think the PF partial submit simply contradicts the spec. Does
it work with multiple forms in a page already?
To be honest, MyFaces does some similar optimisation afaik. But because it is a
JSF container, it can do it in a way to _not_ break the spec. We should rather
try t
imo it's more a general question, because we can never know all of them
(esp. not the proprietary component-libraries).
regards,
gerhard
2014/1/21 Thomas Andraschko
> Does any other component lib has a similiar feature like PF partialSubmit?
> I don't know :)
>
>
>
> 2014/1/21 Gerhard Petrace
Does any other component lib has a similiar feature like PF partialSubmit?
I don't know :)
2014/1/21 Gerhard Petracek
> it's fine that you have a workaround there, however, we need to think about
> the out-of-the-box compatibility with other component-libraries as well.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
it's fine that you have a workaround there, however, we need to think about
the out-of-the-box compatibility with other component-libraries as well.
regards,
gerhard
2014/1/20 Thomas Andraschko
> I added a workaround in PrimeFaces ->
> https://code.google.com/p/primefaces/issues/detail?id=652
