Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@suggested content changes: +1 regards, gerhard 2014-08-01 18:46 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides : > Hi all, > > As you may known, Red Hat docs team was called to help on DeltaSpike docs. > After a long period, they have analyzed the documentation and bring us an > awesome plan that is available h

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Mark Struberg
afaik doing the CMS via svnpubsub is only for convenience. We could theoretically also generate the html pages somewhere else. But at the end of the day we need to push it to svn to publish it. This is our way to make sure we have all in a proper historic context.  LieGrue, strub On Monday, 4

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-08-04 18:20 GMT+00:00 Rafael Benevides : > It seemed at the first looks that it makes you tight with SVN for repo, true but you don't have to see it if you don't want > Markdown for format, that's the default only > and doesn't allow you to embed other documents. > It does > Something th

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Rafael Benevides
It seemed at the first looks that it makes you tight with SVN for repo, Markdown for format, and doesn't allow you to embed other documents. Something that came in my mind was to have the documentation as a git submodule of the DeltaSpike site, that way we can have it linked and splited at the

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Almost: http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html What's the issue with CMS? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-04 20:15 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides : > Maybe it

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Rafael Benevides
Maybe it's a silly question: Does all Apache project needs to use Apache CMS ? Em 8/4/14, 13:51, John D. Ament escreveu: There may be some issues here. For one, does anyone know if the apache CMS can work in the proposed format? I believe it's a requirement currently to separate them. On

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi @John: apache cms is extensible enough to work with what we want (even docx or xls :p). Just need somebody with 1-2 days to hack the rendering and wire it in perl in the DS cms integratino. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.l

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread John D. Ament
There may be some issues here. For one, does anyone know if the apache CMS can work in the proposed format? I believe it's a requirement currently to separate them. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may known, Red Hat docs team was called to help o

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-677) document ds-security in combination with picketlink

2014-08-04 Thread Rafael Benevides (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rafael Benevides resolved DELTASPIKE-677. - Resolution: Fixed Use case using raw CDI and PicketLink documented: http://d

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Antoine Sabot-Durand
+1 for me as well. Having the doc source with source code is a must have IMO. Antoine Sabot-Durand Le 4 août 2014 à 17:52, Jason Porter a écrit : Wow, looks like a lot of work was spent on the analysis of the documentation! Thanks Michelle! +1 from me for all the suggestions. On Fri, Aug 1,

Re: DeltaSpike docs plan

2014-08-04 Thread Jason Porter
Wow, looks like a lot of work was spent on the analysis of the documentation! Thanks Michelle! +1 from me for all the suggestions. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may known, Red Hat docs team was called to help on DeltaSpike docs. > After a long p