ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1319:
Strictly speaking, DS1.x is Java EE 6 based (because we are using CDI 1.0,
But probably no harm in just setting compiler to java 8. (and indicate that
DS 1.9 only run on Java EE 7 server with Java 8)
On 1 March 2018 at 16:05, Thomas Andraschko
I think assuming all EE7 vendors support Java 8 then I think its fine. But
I definitely believe we can't do EE6 on Java 8.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> DS1.x = JavaEE 7
> DS2.x = JavaEE 8
> Java8 in 1.x is fine for me,
DS1.x = JavaEE 7
DS2.x = JavaEE 8
Java8 in 1.x is fine for me, we can try to improve our APIs with Java8
In 2.x we can even improve further and cleanup then
2018-03-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament
2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
> IMHO to move to Java 8 we need to drop support for EE6/EE7. So to me that
> says the next version is 2.0 not 1.9.x.
It is way too early for cdi 2, almost no users rely on that yet compared to
> There are some
Maybe not drop EE7. I think all current app servers supporting Java EE 7
runs on Java 8.
But removing EE6, means for example that we no longer need BeanProvider and
other specific code for EE6.
So changing to Java 8 has quite some impact (but Java 8 is wanted I guess)
and thus requires 2.x
IMHO to move to Java 8 we need to drop support for EE6/EE7. So to me that
says the next version is 2.0 not 1.9.x.
There are some weld 1.1 versions that support this, but no testable AS7
instance that we can check against.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:35 AM Cody Lerum
+1 there is no reason for someone running Java 7 to expect new features
On Feb 28, 2018 9:48 PM, "Mark Struberg" wrote:
> Hi folks!
> Our build, etc in theory still runs with Java6.
> As typical with ASF projects we make battle prooven projects for
ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1320:
Andreas Keefer commented on DELTASPIKE-1318:
Mail list logo