Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-18 Thread Thomas Andraschko
le-impl/ >> >> Matej >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> >> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org >> > Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 4:40:24 PM >> > Subject: Re: CI f

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko
g.apache.deltaspike.modules$ > deltaspike-jsf-module-impl/ > > Matej > > - Original Message - > > From: "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org <javascript:;> > > Sent: Friday, Dec

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Matej Novotny
e.org> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 4:40:24 PM > Subject: Re: CI for DeltaSpike? > > I'm not sure if its the cause or not, but I see this when running the > failing tests on wildfly 10.1 > > 10:31:46,124 WARN [org.jboss.modules] (Weld

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread John D. Ament
; > (it looks like nobody took over that part.) > > > > > > Would be great if this was still done, every new weld release is > > announced > > > directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it. > > > > > > > > > Mat

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread John D. Ament
The main issues are that we're all independent contributors to DS, all with the same level of rights to write to the repo. We typically don't do PRs. We actually do have a PR job in Jenkins for those external parties that do raise PRs ->

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko
ced > > directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it. > > > > > > Matej > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org <javasc

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Gerhard Petracek
reat if this was still done, every new weld release is announced > directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it. > > > Matej > > - Original Message - > > From: "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org> > > To: dev@deltaspike.apa

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Matej Novotny
ry new weld release is announced directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it. Matej - Original Message - > From: "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:32:04 PM > Subject: R

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-11-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
t Weld version (or > WildFly version for that matter). > > > > > > Matej > > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 29

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-11-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
taspike.apache.org >> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:03:02 PM >> Subject: Re: CI for DeltaSpike? >> >> Hi Matej, >> >> they are all on the ASF jenkins: >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/ >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-11-30 Thread Matej Novotny
). Matej - Original Message - > From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:03:02 PM > Subject: Re: CI for DeltaSpike? > > Hi Matej, > > they are all on the ASF jenkins: &

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-11-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Matej, they are all on the ASF jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/ Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-29 16:47 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny : > Hello > > I wanted to bring up a topic of CI (Continuous

CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-11-29 Thread Matej Novotny
Hello I wanted to bring up a topic of CI (Continuous Irritation - eh, I meant Integration OFC) and DeltaSpike. Apparently, there is no such thing now and even while some CI jobs exist (where are they, anyway?), nobody really pays attention to them. I mean those for Weld ones must have been