le-impl/
>>
>> Matej
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
>> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>> > Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 4:40:24 PM
>> > Subject: Re: CI f
g.apache.deltaspike.modules$
> deltaspike-jsf-module-impl/
>
> Matej
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Sent: Friday, Dec
e.org>
> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 4:40:24 PM
> Subject: Re: CI for DeltaSpike?
>
> I'm not sure if its the cause or not, but I see this when running the
> failing tests on wildfly 10.1
>
> 10:31:46,124 WARN [org.jboss.modules] (Weld
; > (it looks like nobody took over that part.)
> > >
> > > Would be great if this was still done, every new weld release is
> > announced
> > > directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mat
The main issues are that we're all independent contributors to DS, all with
the same level of rights to write to the repo. We typically don't do PRs.
We actually do have a PR job in Jenkins for those external parties that do
raise PRs ->
ced
> > directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it.
> >
> >
> > Matej
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org <javasc
reat if this was still done, every new weld release is announced
> directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it.
>
>
> Matej
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org>
> > To: dev@deltaspike.apa
ry new weld release is announced
directly on DS mailing list, so it's just about updating it.
Matej
- Original Message -
> From: "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org>
> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:32:04 PM
> Subject: R
t Weld version (or
> WildFly version for that matter).
> >
> >
> > Matej
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 29
taspike.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:03:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: CI for DeltaSpike?
>>
>> Hi Matej,
>>
>> they are all on the ASF jenkins:
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>
).
Matej
- Original Message -
> From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:03:02 PM
> Subject: Re: CI for DeltaSpike?
>
> Hi Matej,
>
> they are all on the ASF jenkins:
&
Hi Matej,
they are all on the ASF jenkins:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-29 16:47 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny :
> Hello
>
> I wanted to bring up a topic of CI (Continuous
Hello
I wanted to bring up a topic of CI (Continuous Irritation - eh, I meant
Integration OFC) and DeltaSpike.
Apparently, there is no such thing now and even while some CI jobs exist (where
are they, anyway?), nobody really pays attention to them.
I mean those for Weld ones must have been
13 matches
Mail list logo