[jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-1594) Avoid extra lookup in ExceptionInterceptor.search()

2011-01-16 Thread Stefan Seelmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Seelmann resolved DIRSERVER-1594. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Stefan Seelmann Fixed in trunk: http://svn.

Re: Some more thoughts about AP handling

2011-01-16 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 1/16/11 2:51 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Then we will be able to start discussing about what is in M2, then in M3, etc... Let's not anticipate on the problem we will face anyway before facing them :) That's up to you and this certainly is a less expensive way to approach it. Everyone has their o

Re: Some more thoughts about AP handling

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > On 1/16/11 1:14 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> >>> Now, this is true for updates, not for searches which span over more than >>> one entry, which means the entries you get back may not be fresh when you >>> want to use them. >> >> Isolation

Re: [OSGi] Shared bundles update

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > >> I guess we can start using the converted bundles in the studio build >> as direct dependencies. Also Pierre/Stefan could y'all update me on >> the steps we needed in the studio bu

Re: [OSGi] Shared bundles update

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Just a question : as it seems pretty easy to OSGify shared, why don't we do > the same for ApacheDS modules too ? I agree however it might be best in steps because of issues with split packages. OSGi does not allow for split packages: sa

Re: Some more thoughts about AP handling

2011-01-16 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 1/16/11 1:14 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Now, this is true for updates, not for searches which span over more than one entry, which means the entries you get back may not be fresh when you want to use them. Isolation is non-existant allowing for dirty reads. We can solve this issue though. It'

Re: [OSGi] Shared bundles update

2011-01-16 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > I guess we can start using the converted bundles in the studio build > as direct dependencies. Also Pierre/Stefan could y'all update me on > the steps we needed in the studio build to use the direct bundle > dependency? That way I can updat

Re: [OSGi] Shared bundles update

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
The conversion of ldap-schema into a bundle is complete but I want to test it in the OSGi environment to make sure it's working properly. Might setup an integration test using felix in the shared-integ module and make sure the module only runs with an -Dintegration flag/profile. Is it worth turnin

Re: [OSGi] Shared bundles update

2011-01-16 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 1/16/11 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: STATUS: The following modules have been converted into bundles: o i18n o ldap o ldap-client-api o dsml-parser o dsml-engine I will not bother with the following modules for reasons that should seem apparent:

Re: Some more thoughts about AP handling

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > On 1/16/11 11:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: ... >>> - implement #1 : no more modifications made on the backend, all is >>> evaluated >>> on the fly >> >> After this I suggest we clean up shared, and get Studio depending >> directly on it'

[OSGi] Shared bundles update

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
STATUS: The following modules have been converted into bundles: o i18n o ldap o ldap-client-api o dsml-parser o dsml-engine I will not bother with the following modules for reasons that should seem apparent: o all o integ The following modules still nee

Re: Some more thoughts about AP handling

2011-01-16 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 1/16/11 11:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: - first make the current trunk working. We have an issue as the subentries are not read back when the server is stopped, so we can't have the ACI working again. That's a stupid error which can be fixed easily. I *think* I have fixed the issue last nigh

Re: Some more thoughts about AP handling

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > On 1/15/11 1:59 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'd like to share some thoughts I have had yesterday and this morning >>> while >>> I was lying in my be