On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 11:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> our projects build well will Maven 3. An exception is the site
>>> generation which doesn't work with Mav
Although I was going to apply the encoding decorator pattern last
(STEP 5 in previous status) I started discussing the approach with
Emmanuel last night and that kicked off the step ahead of the others.
And it's not so bad to do this first.
Now I have a few issues. First I am running out of time,
Seems we have many more package friendly methods that the encoder is
using in all the Message implementation classes. Like for
AddRequestImpl we have the following:
/**
* Stores the encoded length for the AddRequest
* @param addRequestLength The encoded length
*/
/* No quali
yes hudson supports m3
we use it in hudson @ eclipse
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 17:36, Felix Knecht wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 11:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>
On 01/24/2011 11:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi devs,
our projects build well will Maven 3. An exception is the site
generation which doesn't work with Maven 3 because support for
was removed. Instead a new version of the
maven-site-pl
On 1/24/11 11:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi devs,
our projects build well will Maven 3. An exception is the site
generation which doesn't work with Maven 3 because support for
was removed. Instead a new version of the
maven-site-plugi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> our projects build well will Maven 3. An exception is the site
> generation which doesn't work with Maven 3 because support for
> was removed. Instead a new version of the
> maven-site-plugin must be used, [1] shows the migra
Hi devs,
our projects build well will Maven 3. An exception is the site
generation which doesn't work with Maven 3 because support for
was removed. Instead a new version of the
maven-site-plugin must be used, [1] shows the migration path.
I'd like to add support for Maven 3 site generation by ad
On 1/24/11 6:45 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Monday, January 24, 2011, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/24/11 4:20 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
I've moved all the classes that compose the model into a model sub
package while removing codec dependencies. Next steps:
(5) Apply Decorator to ldap-codec.
On Monday, January 24, 2011, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/24/11 4:20 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> I've moved all the classes that compose the model into a model sub
> package while removing codec dependencies. Next steps:
>
> (5) Apply Decorator to ldap-codec.
>
> I can handle this.
>
Thanks b
On 1/24/11 4:20 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
I've moved all the classes that compose the model into a model sub
package while removing codec dependencies. Next steps:
(5) Apply Decorator to ldap-codec.
I can handle this.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Hi Cesar
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Directory as a subject system in my research,
I would like to know if Directory's developers usua
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Directory as a subject system in my research,
I would like to know if Directory's developer
I've moved all the classes that compose the model into a model sub
package while removing codec dependencies. Next steps:
(1) There's still some more cleanup that I will do here.
(2) Then I can move this whole package base over to ldap-model
(3) Rename ldap to ldap-codec, have the codec depend on
Hi guys,
I'm writing this as I'm currently unhappy about how this project operates
I want to recall some elements about the way we work at The Apache
Software Foundation, not that you don't know about those rules, but I'd
like us to stick to the spirit of those rules, something I think we hav
On 23 janv. 2011, at 14:47, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> as you noticed, some heavy code refactoring is going on in shared. Let me
>> give you some feedback about what is being done, and the reasons for those
>> refactori
Hi guys,
On 23 janv. 2011, at 11:06, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> as you noticed, some heavy code refactoring is going on in shared. Let me
> give you some feedback about what is being done, and the reasons for those
> refactoring.
>
> First of all, the idea is to release a shared/
17 matches
Mail list logo
