[jira] Created: (DIRSERVER-1608) A couple of question os Apacheds 1.5.5 server.xml file

2011-02-16 Thread Anusha (JIRA)
A couple of question os Apacheds 1.5.5 server.xml file -- Key: DIRSERVER-1608 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1608 Project: Directory ApacheDS Issue Type: Task

[jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-1608) A couple of question os Apacheds 1.5.5 server.xml file

2011-02-16 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-1608. -- Resolution: Not A Problem The timeLimit and sizeLimit parameters are used

[jira] Commented: (DIRSHARED-91) Solve the issue with an embedded Felix running in codec while being embedded in eclipse RCP

2011-02-16 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995265#comment-12995265 ] Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot commented on DIRSHARED-91: - Confirmed! It's now

Re: [DIRSHARED-91] Status

2011-02-16 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
Confirmed! It's now fixed. After a few tweak here and there, Studio is now working perfectly in both RCP and 'in Eclipse' modes. Great job, Alex. Thanks! Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On mercredi 16 février 2011 at 06:06, Alex Karasulu wrote: I merged the trunks back to all m1 branches. You

[jira] Created: (DIRAPI-41) SASL connection information is not refreshed after a first SASL bind

2011-02-16 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
SASL connection information is not refreshed after a first SASL bind Key: DIRAPI-41 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-41 Project: Directory Client API

[jira] Resolved: (DIRAPI-41) SASL connection information is not refreshed after a first SASL bind

2011-02-16 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot resolved DIRAPI-41. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed on both trunk and m1 branch.

[jira] Created: (DIRAPI-42) Add additional classes and clean method arguments for SASL binds (CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, GSS-API)

2011-02-16 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
Add additional classes and clean method arguments for SASL binds (CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, GSS-API) Key: DIRAPI-42 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-42

Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods last night. Here are some of the things we discussed and came with : o the getPrefix(N)/getSuffix(N) are cumbersome, and not easy to manipulate. The main issue is that they depend on the RDN order, which is the opposite as what people are used

Re: Merge shared trunk to m1 branch

2011-02-16 Thread Stefan Seelmann
Excellent, it's already done. Thanks Alex. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot p...@marcelot.net wrote: +1 Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On mercredi 16 février 2011 at 00:13, Stefan Seelmann

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods last night. Here are some of the things we discussed and came with : o the getPrefix(N)/getSuffix(N) are cumbersome, and not easy to manipulate. The main issue is

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods last night. Here are some of the things we discussed and came with : o the

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods last night. Here are some of the things we discussed and came with : o the getPrefix(N)/getSuffix(N) are cumbersome, and not

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 2/16/11 9:29 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Alex Karasuluakaras...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods last night. Here are some of the things we

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com  wrote: Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods last night. Here are some of the things we

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 2/17/11 12:03 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, we have had some convo about the Dn methods

Re: Some more thoughts about the Dn class

2011-02-16 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: On 2/17/11 12:03 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org  wrote: On 2/16/11 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel