On 10/19/11 8:52 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
On 18 oct. 2011, at 23:22, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
On 9/18/11 10:20 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to come back to our documentation issue:
- docu in confluence isn't versionized
- docbook in source control isn't easy to w
On 18 oct. 2011, at 23:22, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/18/11 10:20 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'd like to come back to our documentation issue:
>> - docu in confluence isn't versionized
>> - docbook in source control isn't easy to write
>>
>> I did some research a
On 10/19/11 6:35 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
I'm doing some experiments on DS. I saw some problems on our way. Before
diving deeper i must consult you about somethings.
I'm changing the way we deal with schema
elements(LdapComparator,Normalizer,SyntaxChecker) so that they will be
plug
On 10/19/11 12:01 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
I try to update the branch tomorrow, but can't promise anything.
ok, many thanks ! I tested the branch, there are some failing tests in
core-integ, but had little time to investigate.
Yes
Am 18.10.2011, 23:22 Uhr, schrieb Emmanuel Lecharny :
Hi,
On 9/18/11 10:20 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to come back to our documentation issue:
- docu in confluence isn't versionized
- docbook in source control isn't easy to write
I did some research and found some interesti
Hi Emmanuel,
I'm doing some experiments on DS. I saw some problems on our way. Before
diving deeper i must consult you about somethings.
I'm changing the way we deal with schema
elements(LdapComparator,Normalizer,SyntaxChecker) so that they will be
pluggable. Schema manager tries to classload the
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
>> wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > Stefan started to modify the code to get rid of the oneLevel and
>> >
Hi,
On 9/18/11 10:20 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to come back to our documentation issue:
- docu in confluence isn't versionized
- docbook in source control isn't easy to write
I did some research and found some interesting links [1][2][3]. I
setup an additonal user guide as P
On 10/18/11 4:42 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Emm,
Were these unused or did you just move them and a copy was left behind in
the old position?
They were unused.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Emm,
Were these unused or did you just move them and a copy was left behind in
the old position?
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:08 PM, wrote:
> Author: elecharny
> Date: Tue Oct 18 13:08:31 2011
> New Revision: 1185636
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185636&view=rev
> Log:
>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 10/18/11 4:03 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and
>> IPojo
>> will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
>>
>
> I'll crea
On 10/18/11 4:03 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
I'll create a apacheds-osgi branch asap. Do we need a shared-osgi branch
too ? Or should
On 10/18/11 3:52 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
Hi,
today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
associated with interceptors), and
Hi Emmanuel,
Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
Later changes to the code will make it dependent on OSGI Framework. So i'm
waiting for a branch as we talked. I think, if we apply min
Sure.
It's done!
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 18 oct. 2011, at 15:54, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Can you add apache-felix/felix-cache into svn ignore too. Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> Gokturk
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> Author: pamarcelot
> Date: Tue Oct 18 13:38:45 20
Hi Pierre,
Can you add apache-felix/felix-cache into svn ignore too. Thanks.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> Author: pamarcelot
> Date: Tue Oct 18 13:38:45 2011
> New Revision: 1185648
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185648&view=rev
> Log:
> Added 'bundle
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
> have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
> associated with interceptors), and now, it raises a question :
> - wha
Hi,
today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
associated with interceptors), and now, it raises a question :
- what should we do with core ?
It's almost empty, only containing a few implementati
On 10/18/11 2:31 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi guys,
A quick follow up on the work currently being done on ApacheDS around OSGI.
Göktürk is doing a really good job in moving ApacheDS code base towards OSGI.
Unfortunately, at the moment, Studio is broken (code base still compiles but it
Hi guys,
A quick follow up on the work currently being done on ApacheDS around OSGI.
Göktürk is doing a really good job in moving ApacheDS code base towards OSGI.
Unfortunately, at the moment, Studio is broken (code base still compiles but it
can't be launched) due to the recent changes.
The ca
Thanks Emm! Great work ... I thought it would be a nightmare but you handled
this effortlessly.
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I finally successfully decoupled all the interceptors. The subtree
> interceptor is not anymore referenced by the
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi Göktürk,
>
> On 17 oct. 2011, at 17:57, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>
>> thanks Gokturk for the details, have another q. what will happen if I
>> try to run the server i
22 matches
Mail list logo
