> On May 26, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> OTOH, migrating to 2.0 should not take a lot of time. A couple of days, maybe
> ?
Has been on my todo list for some time. As I recall the only tricky spot was
the openldap accelerator client’s extended operations.
Is there a
On 26/05/2021 18:59, Shawn McKinney wrote:
On May 26, 2021, at 11:46 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
I wonder if we still maintain the LDAP API v1? The last release of 1.0.3
was more then 2 years ago in April 2019.
On the website we still list it.
Hi Stefan,
Unfortunately, fortress still
Hi,
On 22/05/2021 22:43, Samuel wrote:
Hello,
I may be able to convince my company to sponsor the work on data
corruption / Mavibot, the goal would be to get ApacheDS production-ready
from a stability point of view. I have a couple of questions:
1) How much money would be needed to
> On May 26, 2021, at 11:46 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
> I wonder if we still maintain the LDAP API v1? The last release of 1.0.3
> was more then 2 years ago in April 2019.
>
> On the website we still list it.
>
Hi Stefan,
Unfortunately, fortress still uses it.
> Moreover, in both the
Hi,
I wonder if we still maintain the LDAP API v1? The last release of 1.0.3
was more then 2 years ago in April 2019.
On the website we still list it.
Moreover, in both the navigation bar and the LDAP API landing page v1
appears before v2 so it seems we rank it higher.
Should we completely
TimoScheuer opened a new pull request #104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/pull/104
…s into child organizational unit and be more specific according to search
class (use krb5principal)
Two changes are done:
1. the LDAP class used can be more specific to allow
