Hi Guys,
Currently i see we disabled transactions on RecordManager at all. It's not
suggested since it introduces the possibility of inconsistencies on data
store even ApacheDS txns might not recover silently.
RecordFile was broken since it was not initiating recovery while
initializing. It's fix
Hi Guys,
I fixed the test in both osgi and txns branch manually like what Emmanuel
said.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 7/24/12 8:19 PM, Alex Karasulu a écrit :
>
> I'm seeing the following in the OSGi branch:
>>
>> testLoadAllEnabled(org.apache
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>>
>>- But i'm not against on replicating configuration completely. Some
> one
>
> would want to simply clone the server in its entirety. ( This is
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 7/14/12 9:13 PM, Göktürk Gezer a écrit :
>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> Here i share my findings on LDAP replication in terms of OSGI layer.
>>
>> - First of all i found nothing related to replicating co
Hi Devs,
Here i share my findings on LDAP replication in terms of OSGI layer.
- First of all i found nothing related to replicating configuration of
LDAP Server on any RFC related to replication. So replicating configuration
is only ApacheDS's concern because it keeps its configuration a
On Jul 10, 2012 6:31 PM, "Emmanuel Lécharny" wrote:
>
> Le 7/10/12 5:07 PM, Göktürk Gezer a écrit :
>
>>
>>>> This is something we've postponed to discuss later, it's not a concern
for
>>>> single server but in replication scenario i&#x
On Jul 11, 2012 12:13 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Göktürk Gezer
wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I would like to know, it config and schema partitions of one server node
can be candidate for replication? If r
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 7/10/12 12:54 PM, Göktürk Gezer a écrit :
>
> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I would like to know, it config and schema partitions of one server node
>> can be candidate for replication?
>>
> Yes.
> I
Hi Everyone,
I would like to know, it config and schema partitions of one server node
can be candidate for replication? If replication of some ApacheDS instance
will also clone its config and schema partition, we have a little problem
because of the randomly assigned OIDs to component factories. S
Hi Guys,
I have a little question with probably quick answers:
* Lets assume LdapServer is issuing some operation through
DirService.OperationManager. If i change the code in OperationManager to
obtain a Lock of target Partition which is exclusively owned by other
thread which is destroying the P
7;m finished.
Thanks,
Gokturk
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
> On 11 juin 2012, at 12:49, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I'm having problem with configuring Eclipse Equinox launcher's logger
> settings. I suppose some of you have an ans
Hi Guys,
I'm having problem with configuring Eclipse Equinox launcher's logger
settings. I suppose some of you have an answer to this. Right now when i
use pax-logging infrastructure osgi bundles in equinox, it is working in
DEBUG mode as default, making impossible to start server(thanks to Massiv
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 5/23/12 12:01 AM, Selcuk AYA a écrit :
>
> I do not know the OSGI jargon but I believe, at the end, changing
>> these should reduce to something like this:
>>
>> 1) quiesce the necessary ldap operations: The simplest thing to do
>>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Göktürk Gezer
> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As i told you in OSGI branch update, JDBM is so immutable in runtime.
> Almost
> > every setter calls checkInitializ
ing other properties to be reconfigurable at
runtime and does not break anything?
Thanks,
Gokturk
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2012 8:18 PM, "Selcuk AYA" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Göktürk Gezer
> wrote
On May 17, 2012 8:18 PM, "Selcuk AYA" wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Göktürk Gezer
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > To let all of us think in a way that is compatible with new design. I
felt
> > like i have to share some basic knowledge of how it works.
Hi,
To let all of us think in a way that is compatible with new design. I felt
like i have to share some basic knowledge of how it works.
Every entry in config partition is tried to be instantiated by
component-hub. There are some things that need to be satisfied to be able
to instantiate an entr
Hi Everyone,
As i told you in OSGI branch update, JDBM is so immutable in runtime.
Almost every setter calls checkInitialized() method first which throws an
exception when its already initialized.
We have to change that behavior in as much aspects of it as we can.
Otherwise there is no point in g
Hi Guys,
I'd like to give you an update on current status of the OSGI branch, and
ask your opinions on some topics...
First of all, now we have ApacheDS running in OSGI, capable of
reconfiguring itself on the fly (partially for now just for test, only
server itself along with interceptors and som
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> On 1/12/12 2:01 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Göktürk Gezer*
>>> *wrote:
>>>
&
things. So i'll work on that before everything. But you can still say if
Authenticators must be extensible
Regards,
Gokturk
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm moving through Interceptors to tie them to our new component system.
&
Hi Everyone,
I'm moving through Interceptors to tie them to our new component system. As
you might guess AuthenticationInterceptor needs some special care. Right
now, Authenticators and PasswordPolicies are defined as entries under
AuthenticationInterceptor's entry on DIT. I must say this is not s
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> On 9 janv. 2012, at 03:55, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I finally completed component-hub. It's core functionality is
> implemented with the latest commits.
> >
> &
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I finally completed component-hub. It's core functionality is implemented
>> with the latest commits.
>>
>&g
Hi Everyone,
I finally completed component-hub. It's core functionality is implemented
with the latest commits.
Now it can be used to :
* listen for annotated component's of any
type,(Interceptors,Partitions,DirectoryBackedServers for now...)
* create, cache and reconfigure instances of installed
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we currently have two ServiceBuilder class :
> org.apache.directory.server.**config.ServiceBuilder
> org.apache.directory.server.**config.builder.ServiceBuilder
>
> There are almost identical.
>
> I guess that o
Hi Everyone,
I stretched my MIA period for a week, due to some reports and presentations
i had to do. Now i'm back on work again.
Component-Hub work is going on schedule. I've found some spare time to work
on it. Almost all subsystems of it are implemented, just InstanceManager is
left for run-ti
Hi Devs,
I'll be mostly MIA for 2 weeks due to final exams. Then we can speed up
osgification process without school barrier :)
Cheers,
Göktürk
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> On 5 déc. 2011, at 10:11, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
> As a matter of fact, I really believe that it should always be allowed to
> do any kind of operation with any session.
>
>
> Sorry, I meant "withOUT any session" ( == with a
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On 5 déc. 2011, at 10:00, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> > On 12/4/11 8:23 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> >> BTW,
> >>
> >> If passing null as CoreSession is ok on Ab
Hi Emmanuel,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 12/4/11 8:23 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
>> BTW,
>>
>> If passing null as CoreSession is ok on AbstractBTreePartition(Schema and
>> Config Partitions.) operations, i might use some pointers
BTW,
If passing null as CoreSession is ok on AbstractBTreePartition(Schema and
Config Partitions.) operations, i might use some pointers about how to use
them best.
Pointers on SearchEngine usage could save me lots of hours also.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Göktürk Gezer
Hi Everyone,
I have couple of questions about accessing Partitions directly.
To initialize and manage component informations on DIT, i need to access
both SchemaPartition and SingleFileLdifPartition(for config partition)
before the DirectoryService is reference is even created, or partially
initi
On Nov 30, 2011 1:00 PM, "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> For sure. Good idea.
> It was also on my schedule…
>
> I just wanted to see what Göktürk thinks of the issue first and if the
"dumb me" did miss something obvious…
>
I don't think you're missing some obvious thing. This may
On Nov 29, 2011 12:00 PM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" wrote:
>
> On 11/28/11 10:56 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Göktürk Gezer
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>> As i go through implementing component-hub, i couldn't
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Selcuk AYA wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alex Karasulu
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Göktürk Gezer
&g
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> > As i go through implementing component-hub, i couldn't think clearly
> about
> > some things, so i need some pointers on them. I'
Hi Devs,
As i go through implementing component-hub, i couldn't think clearly about
some things, so i need some pointers on them. I've made some decisions on
code based on my experiments but i need to hear more from you on these
specific issues.
component-hub is responsible for providing main ext
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I wanted to give you a little bit of feedback and ask for status from the
> other team members (especially Göktük) working on the OSGI branch.
>
>
> On the API side, Göktük introduced extensibility for the comparators a
Hi Everyone,
I will be MIA for the following 5 days due to exams, will be back at 28th.
Take care.
Regards,
Göktürk
Take care Emmanuel. Get well soon...
Cheers,
Gokturk
On Nov 9, 2011 1:16 AM, "Christoph Czurda" wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2011 08:00 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 8, 2011 8:43 PM, "Christoph Czurda"
wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I would like to know about the
On Nov 8, 2011 8:43 PM, "Christoph Czurda" wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I would like to know about the status of ApacheDS and OSGi. I saw that
there is a dedicated branch on SVN and I read that some parts of the server
are now OSGi compliant.
Yes, we are working heavily on moving ApacheDS to OSGI. Howev
Hi Emmanuel,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 10/31/11 10:17 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Göktürk Gezer**
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> I'd like to do some brainstorming
On Oct 31, 2011 11:18 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Göktürk Gezer
wrote:
>>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> I'd like to do some brainstorming about Interceptor extension mechanism
which we're about to implement. Ideas those
Sorry i've made a typo. See below...
On Oct 30, 2011 7:02 PM, "Göktürk Gezer" wrote:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'd like to do some brainstorming about Interceptor extension mechanism
which we're about to implement. Ideas those will come out from that thread
will
Hi Devs,
I'd like to do some brainstorming about Interceptor extension mechanism
which we're about to implement. Ideas those will come out from that thread
will enlighten our way on other extension points of the ApacheDS.
The first main issue is whether we're going to preserve old standalone
Apac
Ohh.This is all accidental while i try to sync both ApacheDsService class on
both service and service-osgi because of some debugger issue.
I changed both back to original.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi Göktürk,
>
> I'm not sure this commented field should b
Hi Guys,
Comparators, Normalizers and SyntaxCheckers are modified to be extendible in
OSGI and left the same in non OSGI environments.
I removed the "String compType" property that i wrote in every Comparator,
and didn't use it on Normalizers and SyntaxCheckers. Because it was a piece
of some adv
Hey
On Oct 24, 2011 10:16 PM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" wrote:
>
> hats down ! Your first commit ! You deserve a beer, at least (from each of
us of course :) (and then you will do your first vomit...
Haha :) I don't think I'm gonna vomit unless you buy me the second ones :)
>
> On 10/24/11 6:39 PM, g
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi Göktürk,
>
> On 20 oct. 2011, at 13:19, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I see lots of discussions took place. So i would like to say some more.
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Emmanuel Lécha
Hi All,
I see lots of discussions took place. So i would like to say some more.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 10/20/11 12:33 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny**
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/11 12:06 PM, Alex Karasulu wr
some unique signature. Like
org.foo.BarComparator. So when
that extender sees that fragment being installed into framework, it can
notify the shared to load that new class name to its internal list.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,Pierre
&g
Hi Emmanuel,Pierre
I just attached my current work on Comparators to #DIRSERVER-1672. So here
is the explanation of how it works and how we can improve.
Because both issues i asked are ambigious. I decided to keep them both. I
mean Comparators are not shared and their OID is also assignable. Firs
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi Göktürk,
>
> Le 19 oct. 2011 à 19:05, "Göktürk Gezer" a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dev,
>>
>>
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> Hi Dev,
>
> Following our efforts on the OSGI side, I took some time to think about
> (and experiment) how we could solve our extensibility issue on the LDAP API,
> where we want our users to be able to provide their own
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 10/19/11 9:08 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
>> Hi Göktürk,
>>
>> On 19 oct. 2011, at 06:35, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>>
>>> I'm doing some experimen
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 10/19/11 6:35 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> I'm doing some experiments on DS. I saw some problems on our way. Before
>> diving deeper i must consult you about somethings.
>
Hi Emmanuel,
I'm doing some experiments on DS. I saw some problems on our way. Before
diving deeper i must consult you about somethings.
I'm changing the way we deal with schema
elements(LdapComparator,Normalizer,SyntaxChecker) so that they will be
pluggable. Schema manager tries to classload the
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 10/18/11 4:03 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and
>> IPojo
>> will let us do everything we wanted to make Apach
Hi Emmanuel,
Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
Later changes to the code will make it dependent on OSGI Framework. So i'm
waiting for a branch as we talked. I think, if we apply min
Hi Pierre,
Can you add apache-felix/felix-cache into svn ignore too. Thanks.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> Author: pamarcelot
> Date: Tue Oct 18 13:38:45 2011
> New Revision: 1185648
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185648&view=rev
> Log:
> Added 'bundle
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
> have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
> associated with interceptors), and now, it raises a question :
> - wha
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> thanks Gokturk for the details, have another q. what will happen if I
> try to run the server in another OSGi runtime? will the server still
> start its own
> OSGi runtime?
I just embedded Felix as debug platform. Custumization i've d
all after
> > complete OSGification of the server?
> > put it in another way, would it be possible to start the server using
> > the existing apacheds.sh script, without loading karaf?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Göktürk Gezer
> wrote:
> &
Hi Emmanuel,
I attached "custom felix framework distribution" patch at #DIRSERVER-1669 .
This custom framework will let us run and debug our OSGI based codes inside
Eclipse. To use it properly, there are two additional steps:
...after mvn install, mvn eclipse:eclipse and importing projects into
Hi Stefan,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi Göktürk,
>
> can you please create a Jira issue and attach the patch there? That's
> the common way we handle contributions. When attaching the patch there
> is also a checkbox "Grant license to ASF for inclusion in ASF works
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Ok, as of today, I have a working trunk (all tests passing).
>
> The main modifications are :
> - we have one sub-project under apacheds, 'interceptors', which is the root
> for all the interceptors. It's a pom
> - each inte
Hi Emmanuel,Alex
I would like to add something to discussion.
More inline...
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/13/11 1:44 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Emmanuel L
Hi Stefan,
Packages are fine now, thanks. About core-api, Emmanuel thinks the same,
moving all packages org.apache.directory.server.core.api parent.
Package renamings have broken the apacheds-service BTW. Its Just a harcoded
class name. diff to fix attached.
Regards,
Gokturk
Index: apacheds/ser
Hi,
I bundelized all submodules of apacheds and shared properly. Temporarily
pushed all dependencies into a new bundle and serving them from it.
Unfortunately. the first problem arised. Interceptors are hardcoded into
config.ldif file, and being load using reflection. So OSGIfication broke
that c
Package conflicts are almost completely resolved. So we can begin
implementing OSGI modularity into ApacheDS. To pass through the list again,
we must do following:
* 3.th party dependencies must be bundleized. Apache commons that we are
dependent on are already osgi bundles. Some of the remainings
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I attached a patch that solves these package conflicts.
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for that. I would create a patch but, it is still not the best
way. I'm waiting for you then.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi Göktürk,
>
> I agree that it doesn't make sense to rename packages as a
> non-committer. When applying
Hi,
I attached a patch that solves these package conflicts. But i'm still unsure
about working on trunk.Package renamings are something hard to describe as
diff. Right now, this diff zeroes the old package contents, add new ones and
modify other parts of code to use new packages. i can also create
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 10/6/11 12:29 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> I would like to elaborate the things about OSGI those we've talked with
>> you
>> and Alex here. So that we can have some road
Hi Emmanuel,
I would like to elaborate the things about OSGI those we've talked with you
and Alex here. So that we can have some road map.
With respect to OSGI's 3 layer (modularity, lifecycle and services), we can
divide our future efforts into 3 main step. Actually the first and second
steps ca
77 matches
Mail list logo
