On 12/9/2010 12:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 12/9/10 6:46 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Thanks Emmanuel and Alex and Pierre-Arnaud and Kiran !
I have a small issue with the Set. Does it have to be a
TreeSet ? I don't think so.
I am very ignorant concerning collection/set classes. Cha
On 12/9/10 6:46 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Thanks Emmanuel and Alex and Pierre-Arnaud and Kiran !
I have a small issue with the Set. Does it have to be a
TreeSet ? I don't think so. An Hashset should be just fine (otherwise,
you either need to have the Authenticator implement Comparable,
On 12/9/2010 10:29 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Yeah sorry this hick up delayed things - it has nothing to do with
your code looks good.
This happens. In Ant there are also some platform specific, timing
related test failures.
Y'all want me to merge it or you want the honors Antoine?
I am fine if
Thanks Emmanuel and Alex and Pierre-Arnaud and Kiran !
Antoine
On 12/9/2010 12:23 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 12/9/10 4:20 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Thanks to you all for testing my work.
I have reviewed your code, adding some few tweaks here and there
(formating, adding missing A
On 12/9/10 4:20 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Thanks to you all for testing my work.
I have reviewed your code, adding some few tweaks here and there
(formating, adding missing ASF headers), nothing serious.
Waiting for tests to complete before I commit my changes. Then we will
be able to
Yeah sorry this hick up delayed things - it has nothing to do with your code
looks good.
Y'all want me to merge it or you want the honors Antoine?
Regards,
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Thanks to you all for testing my work.
> Regards,
> Antoine
>
>
> On 12/9/2
Thanks to you all for testing my work.
Regards,
Antoine
On 12/9/2010 8:39 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Yeah this has got to be a concurrency issue or something related to my
platform. I hate these kinds of bugs.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
mailto:p...@marc
Yeah this has got to be a concurrency issue or something related to my
platform. I hate these kinds of bugs.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Same thing here:
> > [INFO]
>
> > [IN
On 12/9/10 1:56 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
I svn up atoine's branch this morning, and run integration tests on it :
BUILD SUCCESSFUL.
It's failing for me in the same manner after an svn up again just to be safe
at revision 1043945. I also
Same thing here:
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Total time: 14 minutes 29 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Dec 09 14:09:20 C
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> I svn up atoine's branch this morning, and run integration tests on it :
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL.
It's failing for me in the same manner after an svn up again just to be safe
at revision 1043945. I also have 4 cores on this machine and it's a
I svn up atoine's branch this morning, and run integration tests on it :
BUILD SUCCESSFUL.
On 12/7/10 7:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
---
Test set: org.apache.directory.server.core.integ.TestSuiteServer
--
---
Test set: org.apache.directory.server.core.integ.TestSuiteServer
---
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.313 sec
13 matches
Mail list logo