[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release (take 2)

2021-07-11 Thread Shawn McKinney
Closing with 3 binding votes, Stefan, Emmanuel and my +1. Thanks — Shawn > On Jul 11, 2021, at 4:15 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > +1 > > Checked the licenses. > Checked the signatures and checksums. > Built all 4 projects with Java 11. > Run the Apache Fortress Core Integration Test against

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release (take 2)

2021-07-11 Thread Stefan Seelmann
+1 Checked the licenses. Checked the signatures and checksums. Built all 4 projects with Java 11. Run the Apache Fortress Core Integration Test against OpenLDAP. Kind Regards, Stefan On 7/11/21 5:49 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Checked the release, > checked the signaturre, > > +1 from me !

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release (take 2)

2021-07-10 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Checked the release, checked the signaturre, +1 from me ! On 08/07/2021 20:56, Stefan Seelmann wrote: FYI, I won't have time before Sunday to check the release. On 7/6/21 8:57 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: I have removed (and verified) the jboss jar dependency from fortress rest. The repos are

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release (take 2)

2021-07-08 Thread Stefan Seelmann
FYI, I won't have time before Sunday to check the release. On 7/6/21 8:57 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > I have removed (and verified) the jboss jar dependency from fortress rest. > The repos are retagged. Artifacts rebuilt and staged once again. Let’s try > this again... > > > Hello, > > This

[VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release (take 2)

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney
I have removed (and verified) the jboss jar dependency from fortress rest. The repos are retagged. Artifacts rebuilt and staged once again. Let’s try this again... Hello, This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory Fortress, 2.0.6. Here are the list of bugs and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney
> On Jul 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > This is irrelevant. > > Whatever due diligence CXF did, as soon as we know that there is a GPL/LGPL > dependency, we can't cut a release with it in our packages. > > The simple fact it's a transitive dependency is not protecting us

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney
> On Jul 5, 2021, at 1:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > I found one weird thing: the fortress-rest-2.0.6.war contains in > WEB-INF/lib the jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6.Final.jar. That jar does not appear on a test machine using JDK 8. Reading the ticket, it’s JDK 11 specific, which is what

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release

2021-07-05 Thread Stefan Seelmann
I found one weird thing: the fortress-rest-2.0.6.war contains in WEB-INF/lib the jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6.Final.jar. This is either GPL/LGPL licensed, the git repo includes no license file, the pom.xml mentions LGPL [1], the license file within the JAR states GPL+CPE. But this is a transitive

[VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release

2021-07-04 Thread Shawn McKinney
Hello, This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory Fortress, 2.0.6. Here are the list of bugs and enhancements: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FC/versions/12349361 A tag created for git: ‘2.0.6', and the sources may be pulled using git commands: git