On 1/31/11 1:17 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/27/11 3:31 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to relea
Thanks Stefan!
On 31 janv. 2011, at 13:17, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
>> On 1/27/11 3:31 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/27/2011 03:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lo
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/27/11 3:31 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On 01/27/2011 03:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi again.
>>>
>>> I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
>>>
>>> We may want to release a new version o
On 1/27/11 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/27/11 4:01 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
So let's release version 19 soon.
+19 !
Oh, you have nineteen votes?
Nine ! Oops, nein ;)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/27/11 4:01 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>
>> So let's release version 19 soon.
>
> +19 !
Oh, you have nineteen votes?
+1
On 27 janv. 2011, at 16:01, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> So let's release version 19 soon.
On 27 janv. 2011, at 16:00, Felix Knecht wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 03:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>> On 27 janv. 2011, at 15:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
>>> wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of se
On 1/27/11 4:01 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
So let's release version 19 soon.
+19 !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
wrote:
> On 27 janv. 2011, at 15:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
>> wrote:
>>> Hi again.
>>>
>>> I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
>>>
>>> We may want
On 01/27/2011 03:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
On 27 janv. 2011, at 15:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to release a new version of the 'pr
On 1/27/11 3:46 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all the
changes done those last days.
Anoth
On 27 janv. 2011, at 15:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
>> Hi again.
>>
>> I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
>>
>> We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all the
>> changes
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
>
> We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all the
> changes done those last days.
Another idea: we can also use the 'projec
On 01/27/2011 03:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/27/11 3:31 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all
the
On 1/27/11 3:31 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
On 01/27/2011 03:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all
the changes done those last days.
Maybe it's worth
On 01/27/2011 03:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all
the changes done those last days.
Maybe it's worth to wait for the latest Apache pom.xml rel
Hi again.
I agree that it does not make a lot of sense to move deps into trunks.
We may want to release a new version of the 'project' project with all
the changes done those last days.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/27/11 10:57 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> we actually define the plugin versions in the 'project' POM's
>> pluginManagement section. I already updated the versions there some
>> days ago. So as soon as the othe
On 27 janv. 2011, at 11:07, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/27/11 10:57 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> we actually define the plugin versions in the 'project' POM's
>> pluginManagement section. I already updated the versions there some
>> days ago. So as soon as the other projec
On 1/27/11 10:57 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
we actually define the plugin versions in the 'project' POM's
pluginManagement section. I already updated the versions there some
days ago. So as soon as the other projects (shared, apacheds, studio)
use the new parent the new plugin versi
On 27 janv. 2011, at 10:57, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> we actually define the plugin versions in the 'project' POM's
> pluginManagement section. I already updated the versions there some
> days ago. So as soon as the other projects (shared, apacheds, studio)
> use the new parent t
Hi Emmanuel,
we actually define the plugin versions in the 'project' POM's
pluginManagement section. I already updated the versions there some
days ago. So as soon as the other projects (shared, apacheds, studio)
use the new parent the new plugin versions are used.
The question is if it is good p
Hi guys,
it seems that we are switching to Maven 3.0 completely. There are a few
things we have to update in our pom.xml.
1) Plugins version
We currently don't define the version of the maven plugin we are using.
This is something we can add. Here is an example taken from the MINA
project :
23 matches
Mail list logo