On 11/1/10 11:36 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
On 11/1/10 11:04 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Kiran Ayyagari
wrote:
On 11/1/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 11/1/10 11:04 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Kiran Ayyagari
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/1/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>
One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader is not able to
proces
On 11/1/10 11:04 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
On 11/1/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader is not able to
process anything but JdbmIndex atm. It has to evolve to be able to do so
(probably using re
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> On 11/1/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> > One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader is not able to
> > process anything but JdbmIndex atm. It has to evolve to be able to do so
> > (probably using reflection to do so)
> in order to
On 11/1/10 8:51 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
On 11/1/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader is not able to
process anything but JdbmIndex atm. It has to evolve to be able to do so
(probably using reflection to do so)
in order to support all those 'dynami
On 11/1/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader is not able to
> process anything but JdbmIndex atm. It has to evolve to be able to do so
> (probably using reflection to do so)
in order to support all those 'dynamic extension' things talked about
in this
One thing I forgot to say : the current configReader is not able to
process anything but JdbmIndex atm. It has to evolve to be able to do so
(probably using reflection to do so)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On 10/31/10 10:38 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnywrote:
On 10/31/10 9:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
wrote:
Hi guys,
There is a base Index class, with two main children : AvlIndex and
JdbmIndex. T
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 10/31/10 9:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny> >wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> There is a base Index class, with two main children : AvlIndex and
>>> JdbmIndex. There is a third child,
On 10/31/10 9:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
Hi guys,
There is a base Index class, with two main children : AvlIndex and
JdbmIndex. There is a third child, named genericIndex, which is only used to
deal with junit annotations used to create
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> There is a base Index class, with two main children : AvlIndex and
> JdbmIndex. There is a third child, named genericIndex, which is only used to
> deal with junit annotations used to create a new server instance (it's a
> ho
On 10/31/10 6:51 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
hi Emmanuel,
On 10/31/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
now that the configuration branch has been merged back to trunk (with
some bump in the road, I must admit : I just fixed some badly merged
IMO np, what you have done was huge in the branc
hi Emmanuel,
On 10/31/10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> now that the configuration branch has been merged back to trunk (with
> some bump in the road, I must admit : I just fixed some badly merged
IMO np, what you have done was huge in the branch
> file, which caused some errors), I'm
Hi guys,
now that the configuration branch has been merged back to trunk (with
some bump in the road, I must admit : I just fixed some badly merged
file, which caused some errors), I'm now checking some classes that may
need a bit of refactoring : the Index hierarchy.
There is a base Index c
14 matches
Mail list logo
