Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-17 Thread Flavio Junqueira
You're saying my machine is slow... ;-) -Flavio > On 12 Jan 2017, at 16:38, Sijie Guo wrote: > > Yeah, currently some of the tests are time dependent. So they failed > sometimes when the machine is slow. There were efforts on improving this > and will also do this in next

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-12 Thread Sijie Guo
Yeah, currently some of the tests are time dependent. So they failed sometimes when the machine is slow. There were efforts on improving this and will also do this in next release. Sijie On Jan 12, 2017 3:32 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote: > Ok, so I've seen the following test

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-12 Thread Flavio Junqueira
Ok, so I've seen the following test cases showing errors: TestBKDistributedLogManager.testNumberOfTransactionsWithInprogressAtEnd:325 TestAsyncReaderLock.testReaderLockDlmClosed ยป Cancellation They don't seem to fail consistently for me, though. -Flavio > On 10 Jan 2017, at 18:10, Sijie Guo

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-10 Thread Sijie Guo
Liang had a pull request for the assembly issue. Going to cancel this vote and produce a new RC. Flavio, what are the tests failed in your case? Sijie On Jan 10, 2017 9:10 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote: Yeah, I can't build because of the same issue: [ERROR] Failed to

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-10 Thread Flavio Junqueira
Yeah, I can't build because of the same issue: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:2.2.1:single (default) on project distributedlog-service: Failed to create assembly: Error adding file to archive:

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread Xi Liu
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote: > Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :) > I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released > as well, please correct me if i am wrong. > I can pass this command with current git master code: "mvn

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread Sijie Guo
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Thank you for your suggestion, Khurrum. Comment inline. I'd like to > collect more feedbacks and then cut another RC. > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Khurrum Nasim > wrote: > >> Thanks Sijie for

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread Sijie Guo
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote: > Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :) > I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released > as well, please correct me if i am wrong. > I was thinking it might be necessary to release tutorials as a

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread Sijie Guo
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote: > >> Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :) >> I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released >> as well, please correct me

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread Sijie Guo
yeah, you need a clean repo before running apache-rat:check in master. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:01 PM, liang xie wrote: > Master issue gone now after checking rat.txt and removing the log > files generated by privious tests. > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:05 PM, liang xie

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread liang xie
Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :) I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released as well, please correct me if i am wrong. I can pass this command with current git master code: "mvn clean apache-rat:check package findbugs:check -DskipTests", but failed with from

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-09 Thread Sijie Guo
Thank you for your suggestion, Khurrum. Comment inline. I'd like to collect more feedbacks and then cut another RC. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Khurrum Nasim wrote: > Thanks Sijie for working on this. A couple of comments: > > - do we need to publish artifacts for

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-08 Thread Jia Zhai
+1 binding. Build and smoke-test both passed on my local machine. Thanks a lot for the work. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0, > as follows: > > [ ] +1, Approve the

[VOTE] Release 0.4.0, release candidate #1

2017-01-08 Thread Sijie Guo
Hi all, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],