( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness )
Hi all,
There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC
about moving the development of DistributedLog as part of Apache
BookKeeper. The reasons behind it are:
First, DistributedLog is born as an extension t
Sije,
Can you provide links to the PPMC and PMC votes going on for this move?
John
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> ( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness )
>
> Hi all,
>
> There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC
> about
Sure.
The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC:
https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/bookkeeper-private/201706.mbox/%3ccao2ydyzu+r1eaepyhzufxe_w0qakhnyxnnmn5+zx6q520uz...@mail.gmail.com%3E
The BookKeeper PMC VOTE email thread (it is still ongoing):
htt
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> Sure.
>
> The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC:
>
> https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/bookkeeper-private/201706.mbox/%3ccao2ydyzu+r1eaepyhzufxe_w0qakhnyxnnmn5+zx6q520uz...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> T
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:44 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Sure.
> >
> > The discussion email thread between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog
> PPMC:
> >
> > https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/
> bookkeeper-private/201706.mbox/%3CCA
Github user leighst commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133
Is there some way we can make migration easier? We're going to have to do a
lot of translation to twitter futures when we integrate. Should we be thinking
about some kind of adapter
Github user leighst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133#discussion_r121046543
--- Diff:
distributedlog-core/src/main/java/org/apache/distributedlog/util/Utils.java ---
@@ -635,4 +631,80 @@ public static String getPar
Github user leighst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133#discussion_r121046009
--- Diff: distributedlog-benchmark/pom.xml ---
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@
org.apache.distributedlog
- distri
Github user leighst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133#discussion_r121046188
--- Diff:
distributedlog-core/src/main/java/org/apache/distributedlog/BKLogReadHandler.java
---
@@ -201,33 +183,31 @@ public void safeRun
Github user leighst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/130#discussion_r121047018
--- Diff:
distributedlog-core/src/main/java/org/apache/distributedlog/util/Utils.java ---
@@ -635,4 +636,16 @@ public static String getPar
Github user leighst commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/132
Is this version back compatible with the finagle version?
Do we still use old thrift in proxy-server? Etc.?
Whats the long term plan here? Should we get rid of hard dependency
Github user sijie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/130#discussion_r121057253
--- Diff:
distributedlog-core/src/main/java/org/apache/distributedlog/util/Utils.java ---
@@ -635,4 +636,16 @@ public static String getParen
Github user sijie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133#discussion_r121057495
--- Diff: distributedlog-benchmark/pom.xml ---
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@
org.apache.distributedlog
- distribu
Github user sijie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133#discussion_r121057575
--- Diff:
distributedlog-core/src/main/java/org/apache/distributedlog/BKLogReadHandler.java
---
@@ -201,33 +183,31 @@ public void safeRun()
Github user sijie commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/133
@leighst : let's discuss this tomorrow face to face. I am thinking of a new
api with java8 future that works for both core-library and proxy. that means
the way to distinguish core an
Github user sijie commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/132
@leighst : it is format backward compatible, but not binary compatible. I
only change the library in distributedlog-core and shade it. The other modules
- proxy-protocol, proxy-client
(dropping general@)
- Sijie
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> ( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness )
>
> Hi all,
>
> There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog
> PPMC about moving the development of DistributedLog as part of Apa
17 matches
Mail list logo
