Sounds great Clayton. If you need any information regarding the write
up of the wiki page or if I can be of assistance, feel free to let me
know.
Best regards,
Gabriel Gurley
Author, "A Conceptual Guide to OpenOffice.org 3"
Quoting Clayton :
Gabriel Gurley wrote:
Sorry I haven't had an
Gabriel Gurley wrote:
> Sorry I haven't had an opportunity to join in the discussion before
> now. But I definitely like the way the testpage is progressing. For
> me, I have found that the layout makes it easier to find what I am
> looking for.
>
> Clayton, as this progresses, if you find that
Sorry I haven't had an opportunity to join in the discussion before
now. But I definitely like the way the testpage is progressing. For
me, I have found that the layout makes it easier to find what I am
looking for.
Clayton, as this progresses, if you find that my Conceptual Guide
mater
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
>>
>> This is working on the idea from Uwe to split things up into User and
>> Developer... does that work? Comments/thoughts?
>
> The headings are too long and break awkwardly on narrower
> screens. Can we use "Users" "Devel
Clayton wrote:
I've done some more tinkering on the new Doc Wiki layout ideas...
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
This is working on the idea from Uwe to split things up into User and
Developer... does that work? Comments/thoughts?
The headings are too lon
>> I've done some more tinkering on the new Doc Wiki layout ideas...
>>
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
>>
>> This is working on the idea from Uwe to split things up into User and
>> Developer... does that work? Comments/thoughts?
>>
>> Note that the doc lis
Clayton wrote:
I've done some more tinkering on the new Doc Wiki layout ideas...
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
This is working on the idea from Uwe to split things up into User and
Developer... does that work? Comments/thoughts?
Note that the doc list is
I've done some more tinkering on the new Doc Wiki layout ideas...
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
This is working on the idea from Uwe to split things up into User and
Developer... does that work? Comments/thoughts?
Note that the doc list is incomplete for e
this really looks great. However, I would like to rearrange the links a
little bit:
Yup... you're right. The links as they are, are not the final layout or
anything close. We are still looking at the technical aspects of how
present the information. Feel free to rearrange them into somethin
On 12/08/08 15:49, ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
Thank you and Frank for this :) I didn't noticed the More... link at
first sight, I think the first reaction is to click on the more
prominent link, so I for myself, prefer the first proposal you made
with less to read at the first look. Howeve
I've tinkered a little with the layout Frank came up with and put it
here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
(larger fonts, shorter descriptions etc.) Maybe this will help with
making it clear there is a 'More...' link. Converting it to the
original idea is
Le 08.12.2008 15:49, ccornell - OpenOffice.org a écrit :
...
I've tinkered a little with the layout Frank came up with and put it
here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Documentation/testpage
(larger fonts, shorter descriptions etc.) Maybe this will help with
making it cl
Hi Clayton, all,
ccornell - OpenOffice.org wrote:
>> Thank you and Frank for this :) I didn't noticed the More... link at
>> first sight, I think the first reaction is to click on the more
>> prominent link, so I for myself, prefer the first proposal you made
>> with less to read at the first look
Thank you and Frank for this :) I didn't noticed the More... link at
first sight, I think the first reaction is to click on the more
prominent link, so I for myself, prefer the first proposal you made
with less to read at the first look. However I really like the hidden
text blocks. I'll try to m
Drew Jensen wrote:
Using Firefox under Ubuntu just now to view it - if I move the mouse
kind of slowly the cateories ( with the arrows ) can start to beat on
off some. Leave the mouse cursor just a few pixels below the text and
this and it just becomes a regular flashing highlight...
I'm als
sophie wrote:
Clayton wrote:
The page I put together was done just to figure out how to use the
hidden text blocks. Frank has created and example page that gives a
much better idea what is possible with the hidden/expanded text areas:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation_new
Drew Jensen wrote:
Using Firefox under Ubuntu just now to view it - if I move the mouse
kind of slowly the cateories ( with the arrows ) can start to beat on
off some. Leave the mouse cursor just a few pixels below the text and
this and it just becomes a regular flashing highlight...
On my U
> >> hidden text blocks. Frank has created and example page that gives a
> >> much better idea what is possible with the hidden/expanded text areas:
> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation_new
> >
> > The page Frank put together looks nice. One nit pick however.
> > Using Firef
>> hidden text blocks. Frank has created and example page that gives a
>> much better idea what is possible with the hidden/expanded text areas:
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation_new
>>
>
> The page Frank put together looks nice. One nit pick however.
> Using Firefox under
Hi Clayton,
Clayton wrote:
>>> Considerably more user friendly approach. Let them pick the general
>>> areas of the documentation they want and drill down, no more clutter
>>> right on the landing page to have to sift through. I also think that
>>> it'll help with organization and maintenance on o
Clayton wrote:
Considerably more user friendly approach. Let them pick the general
areas of the documentation they want and drill down, no more clutter
right on the landing page to have to sift through. I also think that
it'll help with organization and maintenance on our end as well.
I
>> Considerably more user friendly approach. Let them pick the general
>> areas of the documentation they want and drill down, no more clutter
>> right on the landing page to have to sift through. I also think that
>> it'll help with organization and maintenance on our end as well.
>
> I agree wi
Hi Clayton,
Sak wrote:
> Clayton, I love it!
>
> Considerably more user friendly approach. Let them pick the general
> areas of the documentation they want and drill down, no more clutter
> right on the landing page to have to sift through. I also think that
> it'll help with organization and mai
Le 05.12.2008 11:41, Clayton a écrit :
The main Documentation Wiki page is starting to get rather long
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation
and maybe it is time to look at other ways to present the information on
this page... to shorten it up a little and focus on presenting the
Clayton, I love it!
Considerably more user friendly approach. Let them pick the general
areas of the documentation they want and drill down, no more clutter
right on the landing page to have to sift through. I also think that
it'll help with organization and maintenance on our end as well.
The main Documentation Wiki page is starting to get rather long
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation
and maybe it is time to look at other ways to present the information on
this page... to shorten it up a little and focus on presenting the info
a bit better.
If you look at the m
26 matches
Mail list logo