[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/13] mbuf: use macros only to access the mbuf metadata

I completely agree with Cristian here, instead of leaving to applications where to place their meta data, we can provide a guidance by having this field about placement of application meta while maintaining transparency on the contents of application meta information. Regards Kannan Babu

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/13] mbuf: use macros only to access the mbuf metadata

Hi Olivier, I agree that your suggested approach for application-dependent metadata makes sense, in fact the two approaches work in exactly the same way (packet metadata immediately after the regular mbuf), there is only a subtle difference, which is related to defining consistent DPDK usage

[dpdk-dev] Patch merges for 1.8 release

Hi Bruce, 2014-09-16 11:18, Bruce Richardson: > I'm just wondering what the expected timeline is for you starting to merge > patches in for the 1.8 release? As you have > probably seen, I have quite a number of outstanding patches submitted for > mbufs, and I'm wonder when the "part 1" set, >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] librte_pmd_packet: add PMD for AF_PACKET-based virtual devices

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:05:23PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > Ping? Are there objections to this patch from mid-July? > > John > Thomas, Where are you on this? It seems like if you don't have any objections to this patch, it should go in, in ilght of the lack of further commentary. Neil

[dpdk-dev] About RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS

Hi, 2014-08-21 10:04, Alejandro Lucero: > Documentation and header files describe stat_idx parameter for > rte_eth_dev_set_tx_queue_stats_mapping > and > rte_eth_dev_set_rx_queue_stats_mapping > as > The value must be in the range > [0, RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS - 1] This function should

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] eal / bonding pmd cleanup

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, David Marchand wrote: > This patchset reworks the bonding pmd so that we don't need to modify the > eal > for this pmd to work. > > Basically, the arguments parsed at bond_init are stored in the bond private > structure to be used at dev_configure time. > If no

[dpdk-dev] Patch merges for 1.8 release

> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:20 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: Patch merges for 1.8 release > > Hi Bruce, > > 2014-09-16 11:18, Bruce Richardson: > > I'm just

[dpdk-dev] Valgrind and DPDK - does it work ?

Hi all, I am interested to hear if anyone here have had any luck running Valgrind on DPDK applications? I tried to use this some time ago, but Valgrind does not seem to work together with hugepages ? or I am doing something wrong ;-) I would like to hear form anyone having success or

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] distributor_app: removed extra spaces

From: Reshma Pattan Changes in V2: Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan --- examples/distributor_app/main.c | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/distributor_app/main.c b/examples/distributor_app/main.c index

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] distributor_app: code review comments implementation

From: Reshma Pattan * support provided for command-line option portmask. * removed -g option in make file * spacing adjustment in header files inclusion in main.c * removal of const +3 in delcarration of rte_mbuf inside output_buffer structure

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] distributor_app: new sample app

From: Bruce Richardson A new sample app that shows the usage of the distributor library. This app works as follows: * An RX thread runs which pulls packets from each ethernet port in turn and passes those packets to worker using a distributor component. * The

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] distributor_app: new sample application for distributor library

From: Reshma Pattan A new sample app that shows the usage of the distributor library. This app works as follows: *An RX thread runs which pulls packets from each ethernet port in turn and passes those packets to worker using a distributor component. *The workers take

[dpdk-dev] Patch merges for 1.8 release

Hi Thomas, I'm just wondering what the expected timeline is for you starting to merge patches in for the 1.8 release? As you have probably seen, I have quite a number of outstanding patches submitted for mbufs, and I'm wonder when the "part 1" set, which by now has been pretty well reviewed

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/librte_vhost: qemu vhost-user support into DPDK vhost library

Hi Haifeng: Might be in the release after 1.8. > -Original Message- > From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng.lin at huawei.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 1:28 PM > To: Xie, Huawei; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/librte_vhost: qemu vhost-user support > into DPDK