Now I understand.
Thanks Bruce.
2014? 10? 31? 19:08? Bruce Richardson ?(?) ? ?:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:51:56AM +0900, Gyumin wrote:
>> Thanks Bruce.
>>
>> I also agree with that the size of the S/W ring depends on the configuration
>> parameters because the size of the S/W ring is
Since commit a155d430119 ("support link bonding device initialization"),
rte_eal_pci_probe() is called in rte_eal_init().
pci_autotest called it to bind devices to the test_driver and test_driver2.
Therefore, the function is called twice and devices already allocated
will cause the test fail.
+1 for hangout
Le 1 nov. 2014 13:59, "Neil Horman" a ?crit :
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +, O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people
> found it useful.
> >
> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time. One thing that
Rather than individual talks what about getting them to schedule a 1/2 day
unconference?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Talks related to DPDK can be proposed for FOSDEM 2015:
> https://fosdem.org/2015/
> This conference will take place in Belgium on 31
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +, O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
> Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people found
> it useful.
>
> We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time. One thing that we do want
> to look into is an easy way to allow screen sharing, so
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:45:07AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> > From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall at mhcomputing.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:50 PM
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:18:23AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> > > I would say that D) is a good
6 matches
Mail list logo
