[dpdk-dev] Synchronize DPDK NICs using IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP)

2015-04-15 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Hi all, I have a DPDK app that requires tight time synchronization between end hosts. In my setup, the testbed is connected to a Cisco switch that supports the PTP protocol. I know that the ixgbe driver for Intel 82599 nics support the PTP time protocol, but I'm not sure if the DPDK framework supp

[dpdk-dev] rte_pmd_init_all() with DPDK 1.7.0

2014-12-05 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Hi all I have a very basic DPDK app that runs in two modes: sender and sniffer. In the sender mode, the app just reads data from a shared memory buffer and sends packets out on a port using rte_eth_tx_burst. In the sniffer mode, the app polls for incoming packets on a port using rte_eth_rx_burst

[dpdk-dev] Error running dpdk app: cannot open /dev/uio

2014-12-02 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Ohh ok .. thanks for the clarification :) Malveeka On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Qiu, Michael wrote: > On 12/3/2014 9:25 AM, Malveeka Tewari wrote: > > I do have the uio and igb_uio modules loaded. > > For my issue, I found a workaround by manually creating /dev/uio0 > >

[dpdk-dev] Error running dpdk app: cannot open /dev/uio

2014-12-02 Thread Malveeka Tewari
ks, > Michael > On 12/3/2014 5:44 AM, Malveeka Tewari wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am trying to run the testpmd app as but I get the following errors: > > EAL: VFIO could not be initialized > > EAL: Cannot open /dev/uio0: No such file or directory > > EAL: E

[dpdk-dev] Error running dpdk app: cannot open /dev/uio

2014-12-02 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Hi I am trying to run the testpmd app as but I get the following errors: EAL: VFIO could not be initialized EAL: Cannot open /dev/uio0: No such file or directory EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 Cause: Requested device :07:00.0 cannot be used lsmod shows that the uio module is installed. I

[dpdk-dev] LD_PRELOAD libraries for DPDK to run unmodified applications with DPDK?

2014-09-24 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Hi all, I've been trying to run unmodified applications with the DPDK framework. I used the KNI module and while it allowed me to run stock applications with DPDK infrastructure, it was not optimized for performance. There is already a rump-kernel based TCP/IP stack for DPDK https://github.com/r

[dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with the KNI DPDK Application

2014-09-18 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Any pointers would be extremely helpful. Thanks! On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Malveeka Tewari wrote: > Sure, I understand that. > The 7Gb/s performance with iperf that I was getting was with one end-host > using the DPDK framework and the other host running the traditional linux

[dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with the KNI DPDK Application

2014-09-17 Thread Malveeka Tewari
wrote: > Hi Malveeka > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Malveeka Tewari > > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 6:51 AM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with t

[dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with the KNI DPDK Application

2014-09-17 Thread Malveeka Tewari
Hi all I've been playing the with DPDK API to send out packets using the l2fwd app and the Kernel Network Interface app with a single Intel 82599 NIC on an Intel Xeon E5-2630 With the l2fwd application, I've been able to achieve 14.88 Mpps with minimum sized packets. However, running iperf with t