and a lower level contribution for marketing purposes.
Tim
From: Matt Spencer [mailto:matt.spen...@arm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 6:18 PM
To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Vincent JARDIN
; moving at dpdk.org
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] [dpdk-dev] Draft Project Charter
I think we need
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:41 AM
> To: moving at dpdk.org
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-moving] Draft Project Charter
>
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for your draft, but
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:41 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Hobywan Kenoby
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Fo
Hi HK,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hobywan Kenoby
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:24 AM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; dev at dpdk.org;
> users at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foun
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 9:19 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; O'Driscoll, Tim
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 17.02 Roadmap
>
> 2016-10-14 10:29, Stephen Hemm
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>
> Thanks Tim for the interesting inputs.
> Some of them may require a dedicated thread to continue the discussion
> based on some preliminary specifications or drafts.
Agreed. To avoid me acting as a middle man, I'm going to ask the
ative exception path to KNI that does not
require out of tree drivers. This work is still at an experimental stage, so it
may not be included in 17.02.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, Augus
This email is being sent on behalf of: Cavium, Cisco, Intel, NXP & Red Hat.
Since its creation as an open source project in 2013, DPDK has grown
significantly. The number of DPDK users, contributors, commercial products that
use DPDK and open source projects that depend on it have all
Below are the features that we're planning to submit for the 17.02 release.
We'll submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
Some things will obviously change during planning/development, so we'll provide
a more detailed update in late September/early October. After that, things
dk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 12:25 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 16.11 Roadmap
>
> We were a little late doing this for 16.07, so we're going to try and
> communicate our roadmap for future releases earlier. Our aim is to do
> thi
We're delighted to announce that the DPDK Summit USA 2016 will be held on
August 10th & 11th at The Tech Museum of Innovation (http://www.thetech.org),
San Jose.
The DPDK Summit events provide an opportunity for the DPDK community to meet
face-to-face and discuss the future direction of the
We were a little late doing this for 16.07, so we're going to try and
communicate our roadmap for future releases earlier. Our aim is to do this 6
months before a release. Some things will obviously change during
planning/development, so we'll provide an update 4 months before the release.
At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing this with the open
source community, so that everybody involved in the project can provide
As we're nearing the completion of the 16.04 release, I'd like to let the
community know our plans for 16.07. It would be good if others are also willing
to share their plans so that we can build up a complete picture of what's
targeted for 16.07.
These are the features that we're planning to
We're delighted to announce that the first event in our DPDK Summit series for
2016, for the China/Asia-Pacific region, will be held on Wednesday May 18th at
the Renaissance Shanghai Yangtze Hotel, Shanghai, China.
The DPDK community in the China/Asia-Pacific region will meet face-to-face at
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 3:15 PM
> To: announce at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] call to join Linux Foundation
>
> After few meetings and emails, it has been agreed
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> Thanks very much for th
m: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 1:10 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] aesni_gcm: PMD to support AES_GCM crypto
> operations
>
> This patch provides the implementation of
At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few
of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight
governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events,
registering trademarks, and any required legal support etc.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 8:14 PM
> To: Wiles, Keith
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] releases scheduling
>
> 2015-12-19 16:21, Wiles, Keith:
> > On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 7:23 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] version: 2.3.0-rc0
>
> On 12/18/15, 10:11 AM, "dev on
dk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:02 PM
> To: Scott Nicholas; mdolan at linuxfoundation.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project
> gov
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:03 PM
> To: Vincent JARDIN; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] VFIO no-iommu
>
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 23:12 +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> > Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:23 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] releases scheduling
>
> Hi all,
>
> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases.
> During 2015,
and hopefully finalise it then.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 5:55 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> In order to pr
One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project governance
at the Userspace event was to engage with the Linux Foundation to see if they
can provide a lightweight model for DPDK. This would cover things like managing
a marketing budget, event planning, trademarks etc. Scott
a time for this, before the holiday period if possible.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 5:51 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Suppor
I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss the
External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:
When:
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 8,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 1:00 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:50:58PM +000
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:19 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Just curious about one item on t
> -Original Message-
> From: Hobywan Kenoby [mailto:hobywank at hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: 2.3 Roadmap
>
>
> Hi,
>
> CAT And CDP technologies look very intriguing
As we're nearing the completion of the 2.2 release, I'd like to start a
discussion on plans for 2.3. To kick this off, below are the features that
we're hoping to submit for this release.
If others are prepared to contribute their plans, then we could build a
complete view of the release which
ttps://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101. Further details on the meeting
time in other timezones, and dial-in numbers for various countries are included
below.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, Nove
5 7:27 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
>
> Tim, et al,
> Thanks for this call to the ARM community to convene to discuss
> what support is out there in ARM ecosystem. I am responsible for
> networking segmen
have agreement on the scope and purpose of the
board. We can address membership once we've finalized that.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:22 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Architecture Board Proposal
>
&g
There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.
We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a
good topic for a community call. This will give
> -Original Message-
> From: Pradeep Kathail [mailto:pkathail at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 11:16 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Bagh Fares; Dave Neary; CHIOSI, MARGARET T; Stephen
> Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals fr
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bagh Fares
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 6:03 PM
> To: Dave Neary; CHIOSI, MARGARET T; Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Pradeep Kathail (pkathail at cisco.com)
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:11 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/30/2015 07:0
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 7:49 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Thanks Tim,
>
> Great to see some momentum c
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> 201
At the recent DPDK Userspace event we agreed that we need a body to make
technical decisions for the project. In Dublin we referred to this as a
Technical Steering Committee, but that term is often used on other projects to
describe a body with a more political charter. To avoid confusion, and
At the recent DPDK Userspace event in Dublin, Mohammad Abdul Awal gave a brief
talk on the Hyperscan pattern match software. We said at the time that it
wasn't open sourced yet but it would be soon. It's now available at:
https://01.org/hyperscan and https://github.com/01org/hyperscan.
Tim
We'd like to announce the release of the new DPDK project logo. Various
versions of the logo are available at: http://dpdk.org/about. This includes
horizontal and vertical versions, versions with and without Data Plane
Development Kit underneath, and versions suitable for a white or black
Thanks to everybody who attended and provided input at last week's meeting. It
was a good, open discussion, and hopefully is the first step towards
structuring the DPDK project to facilitate its continued growth.
I've included a summary of the discussion below. Please feel free to provide
any
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:44 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 roadmap
>
> 2015-09-09 12:56, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 9:45 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 roadmap
>
> Hello,
>
> The new features for the release 2.2 must be first submitted before 2nd
Hi Neil,
There have been a few deprecation notices like this one submitted. Since you
drove the ABI policy, it would be good to get confirmation from you that these
are compliant with the policy and that you don't see any issues. Ideally, it
would be great if you can review and ack them. If
Those of you who have looked at the website for the event
(https://dpdksummit.com/us/en/userspace2015) will have seen that we're planning
to have 3 different types of presentations:
Standard presentation sessions:
- Scheduled for both Thursday and Friday mornings.
- Opportunity to present on a
This is just a reminder that on August 17 the DPDK open source community will
gather in San Francisco for the 2nd annual DPDK Summit. It's a one day event
where the community will share some of their developments, applications, and
usage of DPDK. The event will include talks from HP, IBM
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:30 AM
> To: announce at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] important design choices - statistics - ABI
>
> Hi all,
>
> During the development
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey (agh)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:10 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Wang, Liang-min
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethtool: add new library to provide
> ethtool-alike
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:15 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
> rte_mbuf
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> +CC Neil
>
> On
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-05-19 11:34, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:43:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > > Composition of the TSC should reflect
There wasn't any public response to this but we did discuss it with several
people separately who all thought it was a good idea. Therefore, we've decided
to go ahead with it. Siobhan is working on the plan now and should be in a
position to make a formal announcement in a few weeks.
In the
At Tuesday's Beyond DPDK 2.0 call, one topic we discussed was decision making
and whether we need a Technical Steering Committee (TSC). As a follow-up to
that discussion, I'd like to propose that we create a TSC for DPDK to guide the
long-term strategic direction of the project.
Justification
aving some more focussed discussion, I have some
> questions on the notes to get beyond passive voice. I think it will be
> useful to have concrete proposals and understand the positions of
> various entities participating in the project (both individuals and
> companies).
>
> On
, and
possibly schedule a follow-up call in 2-3 weeks.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 4:35 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0
&g
representation as possible from DPDK
contributors and users, so that the discussion reflects the views and needs of
the community.
Tim
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
>
> > From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> >
> > When wer
> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
>
> When were you thinking of having the call?
I put the day and time at the end of the email, but it probably should have
been at the start! Apologies that this wasn't clear.
Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
There's been a good discussion on the mailing list on the Beyond DPDK 2.0
thread. To supplement this, we'd like to have a community call for people to
air their views, and to help progress things towards a conclusion. It'll be an
open format, so people can bring up whatever issues they want,
> From: lukego at gmail.com [mailto:lukego at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Luke
> Gorrie
>
> > On 16 April 2015 at 12:38, O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.o'driscoll at intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > Following the launch of DPDK by Intel as an internal development project,
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4:41 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
>
> Agenda:
> - Software Quality of Service (Cristian Dumitrescu
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:47 PM
> To: Neil Horman
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Patches outstanding
>
> 2015-02-19 08:08, Neil Horman:
> > On
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +0000
> > "O'driscoll, Tim" <tim.o'driscoll at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We had our last community
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 5:11 PM
> To: O'driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00
> GMT
>
> O
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:24 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] docs: Add ABI documentation
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:37:35PM
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 6:25 PM
> To: O'driscoll, Tim
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0?
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 07:57:04P
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 4:51 PM
> To: O'driscoll, Tim
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0?
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:55:00P
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 6:51 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why nothing since 1.8.0?
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:25:33PM +0100, Thomas
> On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ravi Kerur
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Thomas Monjalon
>
> wrote:
>
> > 2015-01-09 04:41, Ravi Kerur:
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > Please let me know how I can move forward on this. If i confine changes
> > in
> > > e1000/ directory
Hi Olga,
> Can you please send the presentations from last Community Call.
> We have Tetsuya's presentation, if we can also get other presentations it
> will
> be great
No problem. Changchun's slides on the converged Virtio driver and Marvin's
slides on the DPDK Test Suite are attached.
Tim
who missed the call, the video is available at:
http://youtu.be/uD_cbE4CVe8.
Thanks,
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 4:09 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Next Community Call, Tuesday 2nd December, 8:00 AM GMT
>
>
ecember 1, 2014 2:50 AM
> To: O'driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Next Community Call, Tuesday 2nd December, 8:00
> AM GMT
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Could I explain port hotplug function at next conference call?
> For this explanation, I've prepared slid
gt; Kevin
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:13 PM, O'driscoll, Tim <tim.o'driscoll at intel.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> >> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
> >> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
> >> J
Hi Mirek,
> From: Walukiewicz, Miroslaw
> Is it a possibility to create some place on dpdk.org available to everyone
> where the slides and recording will be available?
Yes, I've been talking with Thomas about this. I have a recording of the
meeting, and I'll work with Thomas to find the best
Hi Kevin,
> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
> Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?
We had our second call earlier this week, on Tuesday. I'll post a recording of
it soon.
The next call will be in 2
ounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 12:56 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Community conference call - Tuesday 18th
> November
>
> This is just a reminder of our call later today, which is at 17:00 GMT. The
> time
in GoToMeeting, and make that recording available
for anybody who can't attend today.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:53 AM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] C
? Integrated Qemu Userspace vHost
? PCI Hot Plug
? Single Virtio Driver
? X32 ABI
? AVX2 ACL
? Interrupt mode for PMD
? DPDK Headroom
Thanks,
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Community
We're going to hold our next community conference call a week from today -
Tuesday 18th November, at 4:00pm in Ireland/UK. Here's the time in a variety of
timezones:
Dublin (Ireland)Tuesday, November 18, 2014 at
4:00:00 PM GMT UTC
San Francisco (U.S.A.
> From: Carew, Alan
>
> > Did you make any progress in Qemu/KVM community?
> > We need to be sync'ed up with them to be sure we share the same goal.
> > I want also to avoid using a solution which doesn't fit with their plan.
> > Remember that we already had this problem with ivshmem which was
>
nal Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
> October
>
> This is just a reminder for
Russia: +7 495 641 4663
UK: +44 1793 402663
USA/Canada: +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370
Bridge: 5
Conference ID: 1264677285
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
>
We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday 31st
October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so we've chosen
to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is the morning in the USA.
This does unfortunately limit participation from PRC, Japan and
> From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall at mhcomputing.net]
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:48:36PM +, O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Single Virtio Driver: Merge existing Virtio drivers into a single
> > implementation, incorporating the best features from each of the
> From: lukego at gmail.com [mailto:lukego at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Luke
> Gorrie
>
> On 22 October 2014 15:48, O'driscoll, Tim <tim.o'driscoll at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Single Virtio Driver: Merge existing Virtio drivers into a single
> implementation, incorporati
> From: Tetsuya Mukawa [mailto:mukawa at igel.co.jp]
>
> (2014/10/22 22:48), O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Single Virtio Driver: Merge existing Virtio drivers into a single
> implementation, incorporating the best features from each of the existing
> drivers.
>
> I
> From: Tetsuya Mukawa [mailto:mukawa at igel.co.jp]
>
> (2014/10/22 22:48), O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
>
> > PCI Hot Plug: When you migrate a VM, you need hot plug support as the
> new VF on the new hardware you are running on post-migration needs to be
> initialized. With a
We're starting to plan our DPDK features for next year. We're planning to have
a DPDK 2.0 release at the end of March, and we'd like to inform the community
of the features that we hope to submit to that release. The current list of
features, along with brief descriptions, is included below.
Thanks Daniel. I'm sure the many people who've put a lot of time and effort
into building DPDK will really appreciate your kind words.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of daniel chapiesky
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 9:47 PM
> To:
93 matches
Mail list logo
