[dpdk-dev] [Snort-devel] 答复: A mutithreaded DPDK DAQ Module for Snort 3.0

Nacht: what about to submit the dpdk patch to DPDK.org? It is a good piece of work, it will make sense to avoid the extra patch whenever possible. We will review this patch by the mailing list. From: Nacht Z [mailto:nac...@outlook.com] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 10:56 AM To:

[dpdk-dev] i40e: cannot change mtu to enable jumbo frame

Helin is still in Chinese New Year Vacation. Will the below command option help ? 4.5.9. port config - max-pkt-len Set the maximum packet length: testpmd> port config all max-pkt-len (value) This is equivalent to the --max-pkt-len command-line option. -Original Message- From: dev

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog

+1 -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 5:44 AM To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog There are currently 428 patches in New state in DPDK patchwork. Thomas,

[dpdk-dev] which 40G card support DPDK or DPDK 2.0

http://www.dpdk.org/doc/nics i40e (X710, XL710) can support Intel 40G Ethernet cards - Source code is part of DPDK today. http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/ -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jim Hao Chen Sent: Friday,

[dpdk-dev] Avoid stripping vlan tag with I350 VF on a VM

Did you try to remove the VLAN strip on the PF side? -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Shiantung Wong Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:29 AM To: dev at dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] Avoid stripping vlan tag with I350 VF on a VM My application

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/10] VM Power Management

Pablo just sent a new patch set. This is a significant effort and it addressed a valid technical problem statement. I express my support to this feature into the DPDK mainline. IMHO, the previous *rejection* reason are not solid. It is important to encourage the real contribution like this.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Features for Q1 2015

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Liang, Cunming > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 8:06 AM > To: Zhou, Danny; Thomas Monjalon; O'driscoll, Tim > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Fastabend, John R; Ronciak, John > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Features

[dpdk-dev] multiqueue is supported by vhost user?

It is not supported yet. Do you want to send patches to add this support? -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhangkun (K) Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:28 AM To: dev at dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] multiqueue is supported by vhost user? Hi,

[dpdk-dev] Regarding Crypto Accelerators

8086:0435 is also valid for the new generation. -Sent via Intel smartphone. -Original Message- From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo [pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 04:19 AM Pacific Standard Time To: Prashant

[dpdk-dev] fedora 19 / 20

I think so. -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sundeep Singatwaria Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 4:36 AM To: dev at dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] fedora 19 / 20 Does DPDK support fedora 19 and/or fedora 20. Has anyone tested with these distributions.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Request for comments on ixgbe TSO support

Hi Qinglai, >> Besides, as you mentioned, the ixgbe driver doesn't leverage the hardware >> receive checksum offloading at all. On the Rx side, ixgbe driver support the Rx checksum validation via hardware offload. There is a simple example @ DPDK\app\test-pmd\csumonly.c to check IPv4/L4