[dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()

2015-12-14 Thread Santosh Shukla
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:54:08PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Jerin Jacob >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:30:26PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> >> iopl() syscall not supported in

[dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()

2015-12-14 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:54:08PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Jerin Jacob > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:30:26PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > >> iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. > >> > >> Signed-off-by:

[dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()

2015-12-14 Thread Santosh Shukla
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:30:26PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla >> --- >> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c |3 +++ >> 1

[dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()

2015-12-14 Thread Santosh Shukla
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > I believe, I've already acked this patch. I can see no change here so I > assume it's still the same. > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:30:26 +0530 > Santosh Shukla wrote: > > > iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0

[dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()

2015-12-14 Thread Santosh Shukla
iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla --- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c |3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c index 635ec36..2617037

[dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()

2015-12-14 Thread Jan Viktorin
I believe, I've already acked this patch. I can see no change here so I assume it's still the same. On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:30:26 +0530 Santosh Shukla wrote: > iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla Acked-by: Jan Viktorin