Hello Benjamin,
On 05/16/2016 09:56 PM, Walker, Benjamin wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 16:57 +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
>>> There is no inverse of rte_mempool_create, so this patch adds one.
>>> The typical usage of rte_mempool_create is to create a pool at
>>> initialization time and only
Thanks for adding this, I've been missing this function!
On 2016-05-16 21:56, Walker, Benjamin wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 16:57 +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> The big question is how do you know the mempool is not being used someplace?
>
> That's the user's responsibility. Use after free is
>There is no inverse of rte_mempool_create, so this patch adds one.
>The typical usage of rte_mempool_create is to create a pool at
>initialization time and only to free it upon program exit, so an
>rte_mempool_free function at first seems to be of little value.
>However, it is very useful as a
There is no inverse of rte_mempool_create, so this patch adds one.
The typical usage of rte_mempool_create is to create a pool at
initialization time and only to free it upon program exit, so an
rte_mempool_free function at first seems to be of little value.
However, it is very useful as a sanity
4 matches
Mail list logo