On 2014/12/5 4:05, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2014-12-04 10:32, Neil Horman:
>>> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas
2014-12-05 09:42, Neil Horman:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2014-12-04 15:05, Neil Horman:
> > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > I'm convinced we need to work on the build system but it's another
> > > > discussion
2014-12-04 15:05, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2014-12-04 10:32, Neil Horman:
> > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman:
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thom
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2014-12-04 15:05, Neil Horman:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2014-12-04 10:32, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > 2014-12-04 0
Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct
rte_kni_mbuf in rte_kni_common.h doesn't work on IBM Power. This patch
changed from 64 to RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE micro to do the alignment.
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhu
---
.../linuxapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_kni_common.h |7 +--
1
2014-12-04 10:32, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman:
> > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct
> > > > > rte_kni_mbuf
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:59:59PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2014-12-04 10:32, Neil Horman:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > > Because of
2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct
> > > rte_kni_mbuf in rte_kni_common.h doesn't work on IBM Power. This patch
> > > changed from 64 to RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE micro to do
> Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct
> rte_kni_mbuf in rte_kni_common.h doesn't work on IBM Power. This patch
> changed from 64 to RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE micro to do the alignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Zhu
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
Applied
I wonder if we could try t
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct
> > > > rte_kni_mbuf in rte_kni_common.h doesn't work on IBM P
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct
> > rte_kni_mbuf in rte_kni_common.h doesn't work on IBM Power. This patch
> > changed from 64 to RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE micro to do the alignment.
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
11 matches
Mail list logo