> -Original Message-
> From: Griffin, John
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 6:16 PM
> To: Trahe, Fiona; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; Jastrzebski, MichalX K; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: remove unused digest-appended feature
>
> On 17/11/16 17:33, Fi
On 17/11/16 17:33, Fiona Trahe wrote:
> The cryptodev API had specified that if the digest address field was
> left empty on an authentication operation, then the PMD would assume
> the digest was appended to the source or destination data.
> This case was not handled at all by most PMDs and incorr
Note, this is a cover letter - see important clarification below.
Sorry, I missed adding the [PATCH 0/1] and [PATCH 1/1] to the email subject.
> -Original Message-
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:33 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo ; Trahe, Fi
The cryptodev API had specified that if the digest address field was
left empty on an authentication operation, then the PMD would assume
the digest was appended to the source or destination data.
This case was not handled at all by most PMDs and incorrectly handled
by the QAT PMD.
As no bugs were
The cryptodev API had specified that if the digest address field was
left empty on an authentication operation, then the PMD would assume
the digest was appended to the source or destination data.
This case was not handled at all by most PMDs and incorrectly handled
by the QAT PMD.
As no bugs were
5 matches
Mail list logo