2016-09-29 16:42, Aaron Conole:
> Flavio Leitner writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:43:37AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >> My only concern is whether this change would be considered ABI
> >> breaking. I wouldn't think so, since it doesn't seem as though an
> >> application would want to c
Flavio Leitner writes:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:43:37AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> My only concern is whether this change would be considered ABI
>> breaking. I wouldn't think so, since it doesn't seem as though an
>> application would want to call this explicitly (and is spelled out as
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:43:37AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> My only concern is whether this change would be considered ABI
> breaking. I wouldn't think so, since it doesn't seem as though an
> application would want to call this explicitly (and is spelled out as
> such), but I can't be sure th
Flavio Leitner writes:
> An application might be linked to DPDK but not really use it,
> so move the cpu flag check to the EAL initialization instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 3 +++
> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c | 6
An application might be linked to DPDK but not really use it,
so move the cpu flag check to the EAL initialization instead.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 3 +++
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c | 6 --
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/e
5 matches
Mail list logo