t; Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:12 AM
>>> To: Tootoonchian, Amin
>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kerlin, MarcinX
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2016-07-20 15:
t dpdk.org; Kerlin, MarcinX
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
Hi,
2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin:
Thomas, your thoughts?
I have 2 thoughts:
- it is too big for 16.07
- it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;)
Sorry I won
ev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin:
> > Thomas, your thoughts?
>
> I have 2 thoughts:
> - it is too big for 16.07
> - it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;)
>
> Sorry I won't look at it shortly.
Inline:
> > This is the intended behavior with this patch. Ports are to be created
> > only by the primary process. This is required for correct operation
> > IMO, because if we allow secondary processes to create ports
> > dynamically (and locally use conflicting port ids) without any
> > synchro
t port id assignment
> >
> > Hi Amin,
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tootoonchian,
> > > Amin
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:01 AM
> > > To: thomas.monjalon at 6win
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:12 AM
> To: Tootoonchian, Amin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kerlin, MarcinX
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
>
Hi,
2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin:
> Thomas, your thoughts?
I have 2 thoughts:
- it is too big for 16.07
- it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;)
Sorry I won't look at it shortly.
nment
>
> Hi Amin,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tootoonchian,
> > Amin
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:01 AM
> > To: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev]
Hi Amin,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tootoonchian, Amin
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:01 AM
> To: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id a
The rte_eth_dev_allocate() code has an implicit assumption that the port
id assignment in the secondary process is consistent with that of the
primary. The current code breaks if the enumeration of ethdevs in
primary and secondary processes are not identical (e.g., when the
black/whitelist and vdev
10 matches
Mail list logo