[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm/lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm

2016-03-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Bruce, thanks I'll split into two patches and ensure there is no sign-off missing. While doing so I'll also rebase to latest master to get rid of the offset a patch would report. I'll send all three lpm related patches as one series then adding your acks to the respective patches. Thanks, Chris

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm/lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm

2016-03-11 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > Stephen acked the other LPM patch I had last week (thanks). > There was no feedback to this one so far and none of the two patches is > committed yet. > > So I wanted to give this another "ping" for feedback or acceptance.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm/lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm

2016-03-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, Stephen acked the other LPM patch I had last week (thanks). There was no feedback to this one so far and none of the two patches is committed yet. So I wanted to give this another "ping" for feedback or acceptance. Thanks in advance, Christian Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Ser

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm/lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm

2016-03-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
lpm6 autotests failed with the default alloc of 512M Memory. While >=2500M was a workaround it became clear while debugging that it had a leak. One could see a lot of output like: LPM Test tests6[i]: FAIL LPM: LPM memory allocation failed It turned out that in rte_lpm6_free - lpm might not be