Hi,
thanks already Stephen for your ack on this patch.
I was realizing that my lpm patches were still not applied which is ok
given the amount of patches flowing by, but I wanted to ask again.
Considering the discussion between Bruce and Thomas about review and
maintainers I realized it might be
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:31:20 +0100
Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> In certain autotests lpm->max_rules turned out to be non initialized.
> That was caused by a failing allocation for lpm->rules_tbl in rte_lpm6_create.
> It then left the function via goto exit with lpm freed, but still a pointer
>
In certain autotests lpm->max_rules turned out to be non initialized.
That was caused by a failing allocation for lpm->rules_tbl in rte_lpm6_create.
It then left the function via goto exit with lpm freed, but still a pointer
value being set.
In case of an allocation failure it resets lpm to NULL
3 matches
Mail list logo