[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: optimize first reference increment in rte_pktmbuf_attach

2015-06-05 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi Bruce, On 06/03/2015 12:59 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote: >> As it's done in __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(), we can avoid using an >> atomic increment in rte_pktmbuf_attach() by checking if we are the >> only owner of the mbuf first. >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: optimize first reference increment in rte_pktmbuf_attach

2015-06-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote: > As it's done in __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(), we can avoid using an > atomic increment in rte_pktmbuf_attach() by checking if we are the > only owner of the mbuf first. > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > --- >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: optimize first reference increment in rte_pktmbuf_attach

2015-06-01 Thread Olivier Matz
As it's done in __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(), we can avoid using an atomic increment in rte_pktmbuf_attach() by checking if we are the only owner of the mbuf first. Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git