On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:34:17AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
>
> >
> > An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few PMDs)
> > when compiling DPDK with CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_DEBUG and starting
> > applications with a log level high enough to tri
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.ananyev at intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:45 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz ; Adrien
> Mazarguil ; Zhang, Helin intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-d
2016-06-09 13:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> > Today:
> >
> > /* allowed */
> > m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc();
> > rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> >
> > /* not allowed */
> > m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc();
> > __rte_mbuf_raw_free(m);
> >
> > /* we sh
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 4:28 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Adrien Mazarguil; Zhang, Helin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: remove i
rien Mazarguil
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: remove inconsistent assert statements
> >
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > >>>>>> Yes, it refcnt supposed to be set to 0 by
> > >>>>>> __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg()
Hi Olivier,
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:47 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org; Adrien Mazarguil
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: remove inconsistent assert statements
>
Hi Konstantin,
>> Yes, it refcnt supposed to be set to 0 by __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg().
>> Wright now, it is a user responsibility to make sure refcnt==0 before
>> pushing
>> mbuf back to the pool.
>> Not sure why do you consider that wrong?
>
> I do not consider this
Hi Adrien, Konstantin,
I'm jumping in this (interesting) discussion. I already talked a
bit with Adrien in point to point, and I think its patch is valid.
Please see some comments below.
On 06/08/2016 03:57 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:09:18PM +, Ananyev, Konstant
Hi Olivier,
>
> Hi Adrien, Konstantin,
>
> I'm jumping in this (interesting) discussion. I already talked a
> bit with Adrien in point to point, and I think its patch is valid.
> Please see some comments below.
>
>
> On 06/08/2016 03:57 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 0
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:09:18PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:34:17AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > Hi Adrien,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few
> > > > PMDs)
> >
Hi Konstantin,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:34:17AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
>
> >
> > An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few PMDs)
> > when compiling DPDK with CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_DEBUG and starting
> > applications with a log level hi
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:34:17AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi Adrien,
> >
> > >
> > > An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few
> > > PMDs)
> > > when compiling DPDK with CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_DEBUG and starting
> > > applic
Hi Adrien,
>
> An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few PMDs)
> when compiling DPDK with CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_DEBUG and starting
> applications with a log level high enough to trigger it.
>
> While rte_mbuf_raw_alloc() sets refcount to 1, __rte_mbuf_raw_free(
An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few PMDs)
when compiling DPDK with CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_DEBUG and starting
applications with a log level high enough to trigger it.
While rte_mbuf_raw_alloc() sets refcount to 1, __rte_mbuf_raw_free()
expects it to be 0. Con
14 matches
Mail list logo
