[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-12-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > > > To: Richardson, Bruce > > > > Cc: Panu Matilainen ; dev at dpdk.org; > > > > olivier.matz at 6wind.com > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use > > > > > > > > 2015-11-30 11:08, Ri

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-12-04 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 3:57 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use > > 2015-11-3

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
c: Panu Matilainen ; dev at dpdk.org; > > > olivier.matz at 6wind.com > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use > > > > > > 2015-11-30 11:08, Richardson, Bruce: > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-30 14:26, Panu Matilainen: > On 11/27/2015 07:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-11-25 10:48, Panu Matilainen: > >> On 11/24/2015 06:54 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/27/2015 07:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-11-25 10:48, Panu Matilainen: >> On 11/24/2015 06:54 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: > So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-30 11:08, Richardson, Bruce: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > Why is it a step in the right direction? > > > > We just need to install the files in a different hierarchy and adapt the > > makefiles to be able to compile an application while keeping the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
c: Panu Matilainen ; dev at dpdk.org; > > olivier.matz at 6wind.com > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use > > > > 2015-11-30 11:08, Richardson, Bruce: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > > > Why is it

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 11:27 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Panu Matilainen ; dev at dpdk.org; > olivier.matz at 6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'mak

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-30 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 5:33 PM > To: Panu Matilainen ; Richardson, Bruce > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; olivier.matz at 6wind.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'mak

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-25 10:48, Panu Matilainen: > On 11/24/2015 06:54 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: > >>> So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has been lots of discussion > >>> in this > >>>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-25 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/24/2015 06:54 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: >>> So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has been lots of discussion in >>> this >>> general area but nothing yet going into the release

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-24 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: > > So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has been lots of discussion in > > this > > general area but nothing yet going into the release to try and improve the > > situation. > > > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: > So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has been lots of discussion in > this > general area but nothing yet going into the release to try and improve the > situation. > > Are we just going to kick the problem down the road to the 2.3 release? I plan

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-06 Thread Bruce Richardson
So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has been lots of discussion in this general area but nothing yet going into the release to try and improve the situation. Are we just going to kick the problem down the road to the 2.3 release? /Bruce On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 10:24:13AM +, Bruce

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use

2015-11-06 Thread Bruce Richardson
There has been some discussion on the list about various ways to get DPDK more standardised in how it compiles and how it can be installed into a system as a set of binaries. One of the issues we face in that is that the 'make install' command is used in DPDK to compile a copy of the SDK but not