2016-07-14 22:45, Wiles, Keith:
> > On Jul 14, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Keith for continuing work.
> >
> > 2016-07-14 14:31, Keith Wiles:
> >> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile | 1 +
> >> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/arm/rte_spinlock.c |
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Keith for continuing work.
>
> 2016-07-14 14:31, Keith Wiles:
>> Moving the rte_rtm_init() constructor routine out of the
>> header file and into a new rte_spinlock.c for all archs/platforms.
>> Having constructor routines in
Thanks Keith for continuing work.
2016-07-14 14:31, Keith Wiles:
> Moving the rte_rtm_init() constructor routine out of the
> header file and into a new rte_spinlock.c for all archs/platforms.
> Having constructor routines in a header file is not a good
> place to keep these types of functions.
>
Moving the rte_rtm_init() constructor routine out of the
header file and into a new rte_spinlock.c for all archs/platforms.
Having constructor routines in a header file is not a good
place to keep these types of functions.
The problem is with linking 3rd party libraries when
an application is not
4 matches
Mail list logo