> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 6:42 PM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> Cc: Xu, Qian Q; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
2015-07-20 06:18, Ouyang, Changchun:
> Another thing burst into my thought.
> Can we think more about how to setup a mechanism to block those patches which
> causes critical regression issue?
Yes. Non-regression tests are needed. As it must be done with many hardwares
and many configurations, it
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:48:50 +0800
> > Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> >
> > > This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
> > > d78dead
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:18:53 +
"Ouyang, Changchun" wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I think we have 3 options for this issue.
> 1) applying this patch;
> 2) reverting Stephen's original patch;
> 3) new patch to make both QEMU and GCE work.
I am working on #3
.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Qian
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Hemminger
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:28 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
Hemminger
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:28 AM
To: Ouyang, Changchun
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:48:50 +0800
Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functional
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:28 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> On Wed, 1
Stephen,
This patch is partially reverting yours:
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=d78deadae4dca240
A comment or a ack?
2015-07-07 02:32, Ouyang, Changchun:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ouyang, Changchun
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 3:49 PM
> > To: dev at
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:48:50 +0800
Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
> d78deadae4dca240e85054bf2d604a801676becc
>
> The QEMU use 256 as default vring size, also use this default value to
> calculate the virtio
> avail ring base address and
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:12 PM
> To: Xie, Huawei
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> 2015-07-10 14:05,
2015-07-10 14:05, Xie, Huawei:
> Thomas:
> Could we roll back that commit or apply Changchun's patch?
It is waiting an agreement with Changchun, symbolized by an Acked-by:
> On 7/1/2015 11:53 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> > On 7/1/2015 3:49 PM, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> >> This commit breaks virtio
Thomas:
Could we roll back that commit or apply Changchun's patch?
/Huawei
On 7/1/2015 11:53 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 7/1/2015 3:49 PM, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
>> This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
>> d78deadae4dca240e85054bf2d604a801676becc
>>
>> The QEMU use 256 as
> -Original Message-
> From: Ouyang, Changchun
> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 3:49 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Xu, Qian Q; Ouyang, Changchun
> Subject: [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Xie, Huawei
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 5:16 PM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> On 7/2/2015 10:16 AM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote
On 7/2/2015 10:16 AM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Xie, Huawei
>> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:02 AM
>> To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Xie, Huawei
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:02 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> On 7/2/2015 8:29 AM, Ouyang, Changchun
On 7/2/2015 8:29 AM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote:
> Hi huawei,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xie, Huawei
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 11:53 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
>> Subject: Re: [
Hi huawei,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xie, Huawei
> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 11:53 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> On 7/1/2015 3:49
On 7/1/2015 3:49 PM, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
> d78deadae4dca240e85054bf2d604a801676becc
>
> The QEMU use 256 as default vring size, also use this default value to
> calculate the virtio
> avail ring base address and used ring base
This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
d78deadae4dca240e85054bf2d604a801676becc
The QEMU use 256 as default vring size, also use this default value to
calculate the virtio
avail ring base address and used ring base address, and vhost in the backend
use the ring base
address
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: c55e94f560ef5c9fcee4584952de1d0bd414aece
- OS: Fedora 21
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Intel
21 matches
Mail list logo
