[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] L3FWD sample optimisation

Hi Konstantin, 2014-05-28 09:17, Ananyev, Konstantin: > Hi Thomas, > > >As you are doing optimizations, it's important to know the performance gain. > >It could help to mitigate future reworks. > >So please, could you provide some benchmarking numbers in the commit log? > > Some performance

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] L3FWD sample optimisation

Acked-by: Pablo de Lara Guarch > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Ananyev > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 5:56 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] L3FWD sample optimisation >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] L3FWD sample optimisation

Hi Thomas, >As you are doing optimizations, it's important to know the performance gain. >It could help to mitigate future reworks. >So please, could you provide some benchmarking numbers in the commit log? Some performance data below. Also, forgot to mention that new code path can be switched

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] L3FWD sample optimisation

Hi Konstantin, 2014-05-22 17:55, Konstantin Ananyev: > With latest HW and optimised RX/TX path there is a huge gap between > tespmd iofwd and l3fwd performance results. > So there is an attempt to optimise l3fwd LPM code path and reduce the gap: > - Instead of processing each input packet up to

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] L3FWD sample optimisation

With latest HW and optimised RX/TX path there is a huge gap between tespmd iofwd and l3fwd performance results. So there is an attempt to optimise l3fwd LPM code path and reduce the gap: - Instead of processing each input packet up to completion - divide packet processing into several