[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-10-14 Thread linhaifeng
? 2016/10/10 16:03, Yuanhan Liu ??: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:46:44PM +0800, linhaifeng wrote: >> ? 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu ??: >>> The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the >>> desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly. >> >> Is there

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-10-10 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:46:44PM +0800, linhaifeng wrote: > ? 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu ??: > > The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the > > desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly. > > Is there problem when push vlan to the mbuf which

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-10-10 Thread Yuanhan Liu
n Liu > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:11 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu at linux.intel.com> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support > > This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to patch 4

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-10-09 Thread linhaifeng
? 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu ??: > The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the > desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly. Is there problem when push vlan to the mbuf which reference the desc buf addr directly? We know if guest use

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-29 Thread Xu, Qian Q
essage- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 4:33 PM To: Yuanhan Liu ; dev at dpdk.org Cc: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support I just ran a PVP test, nic receive packets then forwards to vho

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-29 Thread Xu, Qian Q
o:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:11 PM To: dev at dpdk.org Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to patch 4: vhost: add Tx

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-23 Thread Yuanhan Liu
BTW, I really appreicate your efforts on reviewing this patchset. It would be great if you could take some time to review my another patchset :) [PATCH 0/7] vhost: vhost-cuse removal and code path refactoring It touchs a large of code base, that I wish I could apply it ASAP. So that the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-23 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:18:40PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > >This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to > >patch 4: vhost: add Tx zero copy. > > > >The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-23 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 08/23/2016 04:53 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > BTW, I really appreicate your efforts on reviewing this patchset. > > It would be great if you could take some time to review my another > patchset :) > > [PATCH 0/7] vhost: vhost-cuse removal and code path refactoring > > It touchs a large of

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-23 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to > patch 4: vhost: add Tx zero copy. > > The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the > desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly. > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support

2016-08-23 Thread Yuanhan Liu
This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to patch 4: vhost: add Tx zero copy. The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly. The major issue behind that is how and when to update