[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-09-08 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
VFIO for that. >> >>Thanks, >>Anatoly >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) [mailto:ssujith at cisco.com] >>Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 9:20 AM >>To: Burakov, Anatoly; Stephen Hemminger >>Cc: dev at dpdk.org &g

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-09-08 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 9:28 AM To: Burakov, Anatoly; Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK Anatoly, Thanks for the quick response ! I am able do PCI passthrough and use the NIC in the guest OS. What I?m

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-09-08 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
day, September 8, 2014 9:20 AM >To: Burakov, Anatoly; Stephen Hemminger >Cc: dev at dpdk.org >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to >DPDK > >Hi Anatoly, > >Has anything happened in this front? Do you see running of DPDK in guest >OS o

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-09-08 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
; Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK Hi Anatoly, Has anything happened in this front? Do you see running of DPDK in guest OS on KVM with physical NIC passed through to it happening soon? Thanks, -Sujith On 02/05/14 2:28 pm

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-09-08 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
Hi Anatoly, Has anything happened in this front? Do you see running of DPDK in guest OS on KVM with physical NIC passed through to it happening soon? Thanks, -Sujith On 02/05/14 2:28 pm, "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: >Hi Stephen, > >> Will this work in guest? or only on bare metal? > >VFIO is

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-05-05 Thread Vincent JARDIN
On 02/05/2014 11:00, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > Hi Chris, > >> hmm, vfio requires iommu support, however virtio pmd? > > That's correct, virtio will not work with VFIO as it stands. However it's not > the fault of this patch but rather lack of emulated IOMMU on the guest :-) My 2 cents:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-05-02 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
Hi Chris, > hmm, vfio requires iommu support, however virtio pmd? That's correct, virtio will not work with VFIO as it stands. However it's not the fault of this patch but rather lack of emulated IOMMU on the guest :-) Best regards, Anatoly Burakov DPDK SW Engineer

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-05-02 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
Hi Stephen, > Will this work in guest? or only on bare metal? VFIO is Linux-only, and in theory will be able to work on the guest, but not at the moment, since it requires IOMMU. There was a GSoC proposal for KVM to do IOMMU implementation, and there were a few AMD IOMMU-emulation patches

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-05-01 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
This patchset adds support for using VFIO instead of IGB_UIO to map the device BARs. VFIO is a kernel 3.6+ driver allowing secure DMA from userspace by means of using IOMMU instead of working directly with physical memory like igb_uio does. Short summary: * Adding support for VFIO in EAL PCI

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/16] [RFC] [VFIO] Add VFIO support to DPDK

2014-05-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 1 May 2014 11:05:38 + "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > This patchset adds support for using VFIO instead of IGB_UIO to > map the device BARs. > > VFIO is a kernel 3.6+ driver allowing secure DMA from userspace > by means of using IOMMU instead of working directly with physical > memory