On 02/12/2016 12:44 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
...
>>
>> In that case we don't need to make any changes at rte_ethdev.[h,c] to
>> alloc/free/maintain tx_buffer inside each queue...
>> It all will be upper layer responsibility.
>> So no need to modify
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:40:02PM +0100, Ivan Boule wrote:
> On 02/12/2016 12:44 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>>-Original Message-
> ...
> >>
> >>In that case we don't need to make any changes at rte_ethdev.[h,c] to
> >>alloc/free/maintain tx_buffer inside each queue...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kulasek, TomaszX
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 5:03 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: add buffered tx api
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: A
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 14:50
> To: Kulasek, TomaszX ; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: add buffered tx api
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> > -Original Message-
>
Hi Tomasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kulasek, TomaszX
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 10:01 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: add buffered tx api
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> > -Original
Hi Konstantin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 19:45
> To: Kulasek, TomaszX; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: add buffered tx api
>
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> >
> > + /*
Hi Tomasz,
> static int
> rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_config(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t nb_queues)
> {
> uint16_t old_nb_queues = dev->data->nb_tx_queues;
> void **txq;
> + struct rte_eth_dev_tx_buffer *new_bufs;
> unsigned i;
>
> if (dev->data->tx_queues == NULL)
Many sample apps include internal buffering for single-packet-at-a-time
operation. Since this is such a common paradigm, this functionality is
better suited to being inside the core ethdev API.
The new APIs in the ethdev library are:
* rte_eth_tx_buffer - buffer up a single packet for future
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:43:57 +0100
Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
> + return -(ENOMEM);
Please don't put () around args to return, it is a BSD stylism
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:43:57 +0100
Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
> static int
> rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_config(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t nb_queues)
> {
> uint16_t old_nb_queues = dev->data->nb_tx_queues;
> void **txq;
> + struct rte_eth_dev_tx_buffer *new_bufs;
> unsigned
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:25:31 +0100
Message-Id: <1452867932-5548-2-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4
In-Reply-To: <1452867932-5548-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>
References: <1452867932-5548-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com>
11 matches
Mail list logo
